NASA still searching for defunct satellite that fell to Earth this weekend
The 6.5-ton satellite that crashed to Earth sometime late Friday or early Saturday morning is missing, according to NASA officials.
Launched 20 years ago, the defunct spacecraft housed an Ann Arbor invention called the High Resolution Doppler Imager.
![falling_satellite.jpg](http://www.annarbor.com/assets_c/2011/09/falling_satellite-thumb-390x404-89141.jpg)
Associated Press
The imager, the brainchild of University of Michigan researchers and engineers at Ann Arbor-based company KMS Aerospace, was one of 10 instruments aboard the bus-sized Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite.
Although most of the craft burned up when it passed through Earth’s atmosphere, some 26 pieces that weigh a total of 1,200 pounds are expected to have landed somewhere on Earth.
But where is anybody’s guess.
NASA has narrowed the satellite’s crash time to a roughly two-hour time period between 11:23 p.m. Friday and 1:09 a.m. Saturday.
“The precise re-entry time and location of debris impacts have not been determined,” NASA wrote in a news release issued Saturday.
NASA says that during its re-entry, the satellite passed over the east coast of Africa, the Indian Ocean, the Pacific Ocean, northern Canada, the northern Atlantic Ocean and West Africa.
But NASA still is investigating where the spacecraft landed.
“This was not an easy re-entry to predict,” said NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris Nick Johnson.
The U-M-built imager conducted scientific measurements of emissions and the atmospheric makeup over the course of 78,000 orbits of Earth. But after more than 5,200 mission days, the satellite was deactivated in winter 2005.
The imager is one of the largest objects ever built by U-M’s Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences discipline.
Kellie Woodhouse covers higher education for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at kelliewoodhouse@annarbor.com or 734-623-4602 and follow her on twitter.
Comments
Gordon
Tue, Sep 27, 2011 : 2:24 p.m.
OK, the spacecraft probably broke up in ways that caused confusion & they can't find it. Why are they looking for it? Seems the are not telling the whole story if they are willing to spend money looking for it on a reduced budget? If I were to look at a globe the path described indicates a few countries were left out of the re-entry path? Is this like looking for your car keys?
omniskeptic
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 11:03 p.m.
Wasn't this a Nicolas Roeg film? "The junk that fell to earth?"
arborani
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 8:19 p.m.
Pepe' LePeu comes to mind.. "Where are you , my little cabbage? I am looking somewhere for you . . ."
Joe Kidd
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 7 p.m.
I guess it's kind of good that they can't find it, huh?
Spencer Thomas
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 5:22 p.m.
20 year old technology? Ancient! Scrap value is going to be a lot higher than the technology value.
SalineBob
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 4:26 p.m.
Chinese? Maybe. Scrap metal thieves? Probably. These guys move fast!
jns131
Tue, Sep 27, 2011 : 2:23 p.m.
That is exactly what I was thinking too. Scrap metal thieves. Those dudes move fast. I always wondered if they had magnets in em.
djacks24
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 4:05 p.m.
I wouldn't be surprised the Chinese already have recovered it (or someone else did and knew the Chinese would pay big bucks for it) and will duplicate the technology they've found but for a fraction of the cost.
JS
Mon, Sep 26, 2011 : 3:53 p.m.
My question is this, If we knew where the satellite was in orbit prior to it's re-entry, why weren't we able to better gauge where the re-entry occured? With the technology around today, no one was able to take some telescope tracking thingy to watch for it on the way in? and if you read this and you're some scientist or something, please enlighten me.
JS
Fri, Nov 4, 2011 : 3:56 p.m.
But what about math and stuff? Isn't there an algorithm or some tricky bunch of numbers for that? I mean come on, the Apollo 13 astronauts flew their craft from the moon back to earth with a calculator and some math and duct tape. You're telling me that all the scientists at Nasa can build spaceships and send humans to the moon and see things millions of miles from earth, yet they couldn't find a silly little satellite? What are they doing with our money and their brains?
Wilford John Presler IV
Tue, Sep 27, 2011 : 12:39 p.m.
The thing was spinning wildly out of control in an unusually elliptical pattern...Even hard to predict re-entry point for scientists with telescope tracking thingys...