A railroad runs through it: Design considerations for car-train roundabouts
In a Sunday letter to the editor, "Roundabout might be a better solution than new Stadium Boulevard bridges", Howard P. Fox of Scio Township suggests that a modern roundabout might be a suitable and less expensive traffic control system than replacing the aging bridges that currently carry Stadium Boulevard over State Street and the Ann Arbor Railroad tracks.
Although roundabouts are often considered when intersections are redesigned, the unusual configuration of this particular intersection would seem to argue against a roundabout: after all, there is an active railroad line right in the middle of it. A little research shows that though unusual, this configuration is not completely impossible — and, indeed, it has been already anticipated by the investigative reporting team of the Ann Arbor Newshawks.
No, no, and no
The City of Ann Arbor engineering department has already rejected the idea of a grade level crossing at Stadium Boulevard. In a letter of September 17, 2007 to University of Michigan planner Susan J. D. Gott, city engineer Michael G. Nearing spelled out the impact of putting in a busy signalized intersection at State and Stadium. With more than 45,000 vehicles per day through that corner, traffic models predict 19 new crashes per year. The letter does not analyze a roundabout as a traffic control device and presumes that the intersection will have traffic signals.
The design of a roundabout at this intersection would need to cope with an active railroad crossing running right through the middle of it. Needless to say this is not an ordinary circumstance, but it has been contemplated. In Roundabouts: An informational guide, the US Department of Transportation spells out guidance, which is clear: "A new intersection should not be designed with railroad tracks passing through the center of it." Nevertheless, highway designers recognize that rail lines do pass through existing intersections, and the guide shows some ways of controlling access to keep traffic from backing up onto the tracks.
Courtesy FHWA
Planning in Wisconsin, building in Connecticut
Highway engineers in Wisconsin working on new roundabouts for SR-35 put together a technical report, Traffic Control Considerations for Roundabouts Built Near Rail Lines, in 2007. In it, they note that a number of construction projects which would call for roundabouts are inevitably going to be near active rail lines, and they discuss the best practices and municipal experiences with proposed and built roundabouts.
In Stafford, Connecticut, the Stafford Springs Roundabout at Hay Market Square dates to 1894. The roundabout was modernized in 2006, and is located adjacent to a rail line.
Heavy rail roundabout in Florida
The most unusual roundabout I located is in Jensen Beach, Florida, the only one that I have located to date which has a busy railroad freight line running smack through the middle of it. Designed by Michael Wallwork of Alternate Street Design, it accommodates over 29,000 cars per day and acts as a gateway to the city's Main Street.
Jensen Beach, Florida Railroad Roundabout by Michael Wallwork, www.roundabouts.net
Ann Arbor Newshawks weigh in
The Ann Arbor Newshawks produce a funny quarterly investigative video report on issues of interest to Ann Arbor. They addressed the question of car-train roundabouts a full year ago in their winter 2010 report; jump to 5:24 for their insightful analysis of bridge alternatives.
Edward Vielmetti goes out of his way to go around roundabouts for AnnArbor.com.
Comments
Ed Kimball
Tue, Jan 11, 2011 : 9:09 a.m.
@Ignatz: I go through the three new roundabouts on Geddes near US-23 almost every day. Although an occasional driver is not sure which car has the right of way, there is nothing approaching "utter confusion". I love these roundabouts. They knock a minute or two out of any trip from Earhart Road to US-23, WCC, St. Joe's, or Ypsi. I agree with Ignatz, however, that a roundabout doesn't seem like a good solution to the State and Stadium area.
leaguebus
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 5:20 p.m.
I would like to turn onto State without going through streets not designed for that much traffic. The circle would do it.
sellers
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 1:06 p.m.
Top-Cat - that line has been identified as a potential Amtrak line (or at least was a few years ago - source: Toledo Train Station Map) as well as a Milan-Saline-AnnArbor regional line.
Eric S
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 1:02 p.m.
Mr. Fox clearly has never seen that location on a football Saturday, and one road or the other is blocked up for basketball or hockey too. I love roundabouts, but that's not the place for one. The Newshawks handle the suggestion with appropriate seriousness.
Killroy
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 12:59 p.m.
Cool idea. Saves us money and is elegant and easy to implement. Bravo!
Top Cat
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 12:32 p.m.
There are only 1-2 slow freight trains per day on this line. The existance of the railroad is a consideration but not a major one.
Ignatz
Mon, Jan 10, 2011 : 12:10 p.m.
I can't imagine anything crazier. Given the utter confusion caused by railroad crossing free roundabouts in this area, I can only guess how those with crossings will be greeted. Spend the money for a bridge already.