Big Ten athletic directors consider 9 conference games for football and moving league basketball games
CHICAGO — The biggest issue surrounding whether or not the Big Ten Conference will go to nine in-conference football games isn’t about competitive balance or the potential of shortening the non-conference schedule.
The biggest hangup is simple. The Big Ten’s athletic directors want seven home games each season, and that's not easy to accomplish each year if the league goes to nine conference games.
“We still want to have seven games,” Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez said. “That’s part of our budget, to have seven home games.”
If the league goes to nine games, each team would have room for three non-conference games. In some cases, teams are locked into home-and-home out of conference rivalries, which could lead to six home games if the years stack up wrong.
BIG TEN MEETINGS COVERAGE
-
Coaches, ADs consider starting conference basketball games earlier in December
-
News, notes, observations and thoughts from the meetings
-
Brady Hoke is no fan of the early signing period
-
Michigan vs. Ohio State football at night? Not a bright idea, Hoke says
-
Jim Tressel says Hoke boosts the Ohio State-Michigan rivalry
-
Ohio State AD Gene Smith supports Tressel
-
ADs consider 9 games for football, moving league basketball games
-
Commissioner Jim Delaney on Ohio State: 'A lot of interest, and I don't think it's positive'
-
Big Ten is looking at Chicago and Indianapolis for future football and basketball championships
-
Michigan AD Dave Brandon wants a 9-game football schedule sooner rather than later
-
Michigan football team ahead of schedule in cutting practice time required from NCAA violations
-
Brandon outlines more Crisler Arena renovations
“That’s the number one thing,” Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said at the Big Ten spring meetings.
Delany said some of the league’s coaches would like to remain at eight conference games, which means they would miss four league opponents. Nine conference games, Delany said, would give “a truer champion” because it would mean just three missed teams per year.
It is an idea most of the league’s athletic directors and coaches have discussed prior to this week’s meetings. Michigan athletic director Dave Brandon said this week he’d like to see nine Big Ten games happen sooner than later.
There are a lot of possibilities if the league adds a ninth conference game, including another protected rivalry. Most athletic directors Monday and Tuesday said it is also what the fans want.
Nothing surrounding the nine-game schedule has been decided or likely will be voted on by the end of the meetings, which conclude Wednesday.
With teams having non-conference games scheduled out almost into next decade, Brandon felt it was unlikely the league could do it before 2017, which would also be the same time the league will start a new television deal.
“It’s still lots of opinions and still not a final vote,” Iowa athletic director Gary Barta said. “The point I’ve always felt our conference has been at is that it is likely to happen. I feel like that’s still where it is but just lots of great discussion of what’s best for the Big Ten conference.”
Delany also said the league’s basketball coaches discussed possibly moving some conference games to early-to-mid December in order to start the conference season away from the crush of college football bowl games.
Michael Rothstein covers University of Michigan basketball for AnnArbor.com. He can be reached at (734) 623-2558, by email at michaelrothstein@annarbor.com or follow along on Twitter @mikerothstein
Comments
heartbreakM
Wed, May 18, 2011 : 2:19 p.m.
Get rid of the bottom feeder games, even if it is a cash cow for the schools. Nobody wants to see the Big Ten-Division III games anymore. Minnesota, Wisconsin, OSU, MSU, UM, Purdue, Penn State have been routinely playing these lately, and at least for UM, Brandon has gotten rid of those games. I personally think that playing more than one MAC school is excessive. If Big Ten does that, that should clear out the schedule and still allow for the highly anticipated matchups like UM-ND, OSU-USC, PSU-Temple, MSU-Central Michigan (LOL). Questions will be: what is more important? A full competitive big ten schedule that fans want to see, or money and a sure win (which will turn into losses as Toledo and App State show)?