University of Michigan earns 10-year accreditation; report compliments and criticizes diversity initiatives
The University of Michigan is a premier research institution with a glowing international reputation, but its efforts to maintain a diverse student body need continuing attention, an accreditation team found.
A team from the Higher Education Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools team awarded U-M a 10-year accreditation, the university announced Tuesday.
The commission's report identified diversity as an area of improvement, noting U-M's student body has 6 percent black students while Michigan’s population has close to 15 percent black students.
But the HLC report also complimented U-M’s overall commitment to diversity, listing initiatives like the Office of Academic Multicultural Initiatives, which assists in the recruitment of multicultural students, and the ADVANCE Program, which supports women in science and engineering, as evidence of that commitment. It also noted the Regents’ policy for providing enough financial aid to Michigan residents to mitigate the impact of tuition increases.
Lon Horwedel | AnnArbor.com
Still, graduation rates of underrepresented minorities - black, Hispanic and Native American - students “still lag significantly behind those of majority students,” the report states. And that's a problem faced by students at universities across the nation.
Some of the commission’s comments on diversity are reminiscent of a January report by the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group Education Trust. The group gave U-M low marks after it studied how well the nation's best public research institutions reflect the student populations of their states.
School officials defended U-M in response, stating an education at the state's flagship institution is within the reach of all qualified state residents.
There is no mention in either report of Proposal 2, the measure approved by Michigan voters in 2006 that banned racial and gender preferences in government hiring and public university admissions.
Overall, U-M is doing well to expand and grow as state appropriations continue to shrink, the HLC report states. The commission commended U-M on the establishment of 100 new faculty positions; for its plans for the North Campus Research Corridor to help further the university’s academic mission; and its establishment of the University Research Corridor, a collaboration with Michigan State and Wayne State universities to promote research innovation and support Michigan’s economic rebirth.
“The university not only met the standards for accreditation by the association, but it excelled in nearly all areas, receiving high praise from the review team,” U-M President Mary Sue Coleman said in a written statement.
The report also provided suggestions on U-M’s plans to create a more global university, the topic of a self-study it handed to the commission for assessment. As it moves forward, U-M should take special care to help all students with the desire to have a global classroom experience. A central location, perhaps within the International Institute, that supports international activities was also suggested.
U-M has been accredited since 1913; the process is meant to assure the public that universities are meeting standards and maintaining the quality of academic programming and other activities. The latest accreditation took two-and-a-half years and the next is scheduled to begin in 2019.
Juliana Keeping is a reporter for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at julianakeeping@annarbor.com or 734-623-2528. Follow Juliana Keeping on Twitter
Comments
A2lover
Wed, Jul 7, 2010 : 4:44 p.m.
It seems to me that U of M bends over backwards to recruit minority students and faculty, frequently to the detriment and downscaling of education and sacrificing faculty sophistication. U of M appears desperate in their inclusionary tactics that, more often than not, doesn't mean a hill of beans to minorities or succeeds in closing the diversity gap. Part of this of course is location. Students of all types usually want to go to a university in a large metropolitan area, a big city. Although Ann Arbor is a terrific place to live it 'aint New york, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.
BobbyJohn
Wed, Jul 7, 2010 : 11:51 a.m.
the obvious reason to ALMOST everybody that certain minority students have a poor record of accomplishment at U of M, is that unqualified students are admitted. U of M is a prestigious institution of HIGHER learning and the fact that some admitted students have to take what are in reality remedial courses is ridiculous.
Drake
Wed, Jul 7, 2010 : 6:51 a.m.
The stupidity of sacrificing Michigan's entire intellectual and academic future on the endless efforts of satisfying the various gods of diversity is complete and total ignorance personified. Where all roads should be leading to advancing humanity and culture;it is very apparent that the people doing this so called "study" have Not studied the facts of what diversity has already delivered over the past four and a half decades all across America and has done to our society;and the horrors of the devastation to our academic system, by blindly following a multicultural fantasy,while maintaining a dumbing down of those who obviously could some day be the creators and innovators of a far better tomorrow. Keep giving away America's, and Michigan's,future to the undeserving and the unable;as they progressively come into view to replace you and bring into your halls of academia even more ill equipped and more foolish people like yourselves;as we all sit in our diverse and multicultural classes and colleges,practicing acceptance and enjoy watching the once disenfranchised dismantle the infrastructure that our forefathers and generations before, spent their lives and fortunes to create.
Mikey2u
Tue, Jul 6, 2010 : 9:27 p.m.
Obviously the Higher Education Commission has never heard of the Detroit Public School system, the Willow Run School District or Ypsilanti Public Schools.