You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 2:15 p.m.

Ann Arbor City Council to consider resolutions on former Greek church property, Y lot

By Ben Freed

greek_church_tax_foreclosure.jpg

Melanie Maxwel | AnnArbor.com

The Ann Arbor City Council tonight will consider two proposals that could affect the future of two high-profile properties in the city.

One is the Fifth and William parking lot on the old YMCA property at 350 S. Fifth Ave. The other is the decaying building formerly occupied by the former Greek church at 414 N. Main St.

Both resolutions, added on Friday, are sponsored by council member Stephen Kunselman (D-Ward 3).

The first resolution would call for the city administrator’s office to initiate a process independent of the Downtown Development Authority to examine possibilities for the Fifth and William parking lot. The parcel is part of the DDA’s “Connecting William Street” planning effort.

“We have a balloon payment of $3.5 million due I think in Dec. 2013,” Kunselman said.

“We can’t just show up in '13 and say, ‘let’s just extend it with interest-only payments’ like we’ve been doing since 2003. My resolution is to light a fire under the council and under the mayor in particular to start moving the ball.”

072411_stephen_KUNSELMAN.jpg

Councilman Stephen Kunselman

The property has been a source of consternation for the city. With demolition costs, rent for displaced occupants, interest-only payments, and a lawsuit, Kunselman estimates the city has already sunk $6 million into the property.

“I’m tired of throwing money into a hole,” he said. “Or in this case onto a surface lot.”

Kunselman’s resolution would not effect the DDA’s handling of the other four properties that are a part of the Connecting William Street project.

The other resolution added on Friday would begin a rezoning process for old St. Nickolas Church at 414 N. Main St. in Kerrytown. Since its forclosure earlier this year, the property has been under the control of the Washtenaw County treasurer’s office.

In 2006, the lot was zoned as a planned unit development (PUD) when developers submitted a plan to build a 158-foot multi-family residence that would be known as “The Gallery.” Kunselman wants to down-zone the property to a downtown interface (D-2) parcel with a height limit of 60 feet that would more closely match the surrounding neighborhood.

“The community had this expectation that the Kerrytown neighborhood would have a height limit of 60 feet,” he said.

“It sounded good, but it’s a failed project, and we need to remove the scar of that PUD. I don’t feel that my role as a council member is to be an enabler of someone else’s fantasy.”

Kunselman said that some council members likely would be hesitant to downzone the property because they believe it will be more valuable to developers if they can build higher. However, the property already has an obligation to provide 57 parking spots to the neighboring property owner and the PUD zoning comes with a commitment to build at least 18 affordable housing units. Kunselman believes these restrictions will scare away developers more than a change in zoning.

“If it’s worth so much as a PUD property, why did it go to county tax forclosure?” he asked. “It’s got a lot of problems.”

The property will be up for auction starting Sept. 6 through Sept. 11. The minimum bid, equal to the back taxes owed plus demolition costs, is $365,051. While Kunselman recognizes that any rezoning cannot be accomplished before the auction, he wants it to be public that it is an option as the process moves forward.

Tonight’s city council meeting will be held at 7 in the City Hall Council Chamber, 301 E. Huron St. Meetings are open to the public and televised on CTN Cable Channel 16.

Ben Freed covers business for AnnArbor.com. Reach him at 734-623-2528 or email him at benfreed@annarbor.com. Follow him on twitter @BFreedinA2

Comments

whatsupwithMI

Tue, Aug 21, 2012 : 1:24 a.m.

RE: who took the copper dome: workers were removing that a number of years ago on a Farmer Market weekend. Gotta go with the landlord that one. Too bad they left the roof open which accelerated the breakdown of the building, but I'm sure AA is glad the landlord enriched himself in the process.

demistify

Tue, Aug 21, 2012 : 12:21 a.m.

"...building formerly occupied by the former Greek church..." Elementary literacy might help the story. There is nothing former about the Greek church, it continues to exist. It has moved to a new building at another location (and vacated the old building that the story refers to).

LXIX

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 8:05 p.m.

"Ok then. So nobody wants to talk about 4th ave." "How about the DDA parking need for crowding more traffic into town and the repeal of the Pedestrian Law?"

LXIX

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 7:43 p.m.

"Okay council, let's open up 4th ave. for discussion". "Hey, how about a big eraser highrise? Rub out of all those past mistakes we've made sucking up to those fly-by-night highrise builders promising us their sky?".

John of Saline

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 7:14 p.m.

Wonder who took/stole the copper dome.

a2grateful

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 7:10 p.m.

Agree with Councilman Stephen Kunselman. Get the old YMCA lot off the taxpayer's back. Let the private sector pay for it, develop it, and pay taxes on it. Likewise, send an inviting message to potential developers of former Greek Orthodox Church that the site does not have to be strangled by the current PUD plan. That plan is failed and infeasible. In other words, that PUD is a dud. . . "My resolution is to light a fire under the council and under the mayor in particular. . ." Good luck with that. First you must infuse the city council tomb with oxygen (wisdom), allowing life. No fire can ever be lit without it.

Stephen Landes

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 : 7:03 p.m.

Maybe the DDA would move faster if they were responsible for balloon payment and any interest costs for extending the payment date. Writing checks for those payments should help concentrate their focus on the planning effort. My personal opinion is that the DDA has no compelling vision and, therefore, nothing that drives them to do planning.