Ann Arbor police chief: Cuts won't compromise city's safety
Some residents worry Ann Arbor's safety could be at risk after the recent early retirement of 25 veteran city police officers.
But Police Chief Barnett Jones said there's no need to worry because the Ann Arbor Police Department has been restructured to ensure no fewer patrol officers are on the streets now than before the downsizing last month.“Ann Arbor is just as safe as it was before,” Jones said. “I am tired of people saying our community is not going to be safe. We’ve got police officers here that are stepping in and filling the gap. We’ve been cutting police officers since 2000, and has crime run amok because people are leaving? No.”
But resident Cendra Lynn, 65, said cuts over the years are taking their toll.
“In my personal opinion, we’re way below safe levels,” said Lynn, who lives on Crest Street on the city’s west side and previously headed her neighborhood watch group. “My friends on the (police) force disagree with me, that if there is an emergency, they’ll be able to handle it. But they can’t do anything else. For example, we have no crime prevention programs.
“The morale and dedication of the police force is not at all in question,” she said. “But we are extremely lucky, and I don’t know how long you can keep on making them do more than they can possibly do without pushing the morale down.”
The most recent staff reduction was the result of city budget cuts.
Taking early retirements were four lieutenants, five sergeants, four detectives, 10 officers and two dispatchers. In all, they had more than 590 years experience with the department; all but one had at least 20 years of tenure.
Four of the five supervisors in the detective bureau left.
The number of patrol officers on the force remains at 64, Jones said.
Rather than promoting officers to replace retiring supervisors, the remaining lieutenants and sergeants are taking on the duties of their departing peers. There's less specialization under the downsized departments - community affairs and downtown beat patrol positions were eliminated, with patrol officers now handling those duties.
The Police Department now has 175 employees, including 125 sworn officers, Jones said. That’s down from about 210 sworn officers nine years ago, he said, but crime data shows the smaller force has kept the city safe.
Through early July, robberies, aggravated assaults, stolen cars and break-ins were down more than 30 percent from the previous July, Jones said. Larcenies were down significantly.
The early retirements will cost the city about $4.9 million, said city financial analyst Stephanie Julian. Officials project it will take less than three years to recoup the early retirement costs.
The cost evaluation for the early retirement plan was based on 18 of the 34 eligible officers accepting the offer, and none being replaced. The city hasn't decided whether to replace the additional seven officers, said Tom Crawford, the city’s chief financial officer.
Officer Sam James, president of the Ann Arbor Police Officers Association, said union officials are concerned about how the force will be able to handle special events such as University of Michigan football games.
“I think we’ll still be able to respond to emergency calls (as quickly as in the past),” James said.
But he said wait times will increase for non-emergency calls, such as non-injury traffic crashes that aren't blocking traffic.
Granger Avenue resident Nancy Leff, 54, chairwoman of the Lower Burns Park Association, said her association is discouraged by the police staffing cuts, including elimination of community police positions she said helped keep neighborhoods clean and peaceful.
Jones said the early retirement plan spared the police department from layoffs that would have been far more detrimental. Communities that lay off cops have problems recruiting experienced officers in the future, he said.
With the state struggling financially, Jones hopes such drastic measures won’t be needed. “Did we just stall what will be inevitable in our community?” he asked. “I hope not.”
Comments
Sarcastic1
Mon, Jul 27, 2009 : 8:19 a.m.
If anyone really thinks safety will not be compromised with a 40% staff reduction, you are living with your head in the clouds. Combine the reductions with unemployment and prisoners being put on parole at an unprecedented rate, it is only a matter of before the crime rate rises and Ann Arbor is no longer one of the best places to live in the US.
righta2
Fri, Jul 24, 2009 : 2:01 p.m.
I don't see how it will be safer, nor how the response time on a call go down. Nor the amount of time to close a case won't be effected
Bob Heinold
Fri, Jul 24, 2009 : 10:10 a.m.
Ann Arbor is displaying many of the characteristics of pre-Giuliani New York City. There has been an increase in graffiti, cyclists (on the road) disobeying traffic rules, unleashed dogs, no patrols in neighborhoods like Wines, suspicious crime statistics, a police department forced to manage enforcement rather than enforce. To make matters worse, they are ruled over by a city administration that doesn't do basic governing and so we get a greenbelt along with unmaintained roads. Ignoring all these little things will lead to big trouble.
Hunterjim
Fri, Jul 24, 2009 : 7:33 a.m.
The men and women of the Ann Arbor Police are the very best! but when you cut the force by 40% in the last 9 years the ability to follow up on criminal cases does suffer. Case loads for Detectives suffer and more cases are just not assigned for follow-up. Proactive programs involving things like Crime prevention are eliminated. Chief Jones is correct in saying if you dial 911 a Police Officer will respond to an emergency or crime in progress...but after that the staffing level will dictate how soon if ever a case will be followed up.