You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 10:35 a.m.

Following teachings of inclusion, compassion a choice that needs to be made

By Guest Column

Last year on Sept. 11, I witnessed people from Jewish, Christian, Muslim, secular, and other backgrounds come together to restore native habitat, care for veterans, support refugees, and promote healing on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

How different is that image from this year’s accounts of violent attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, and from the insensitive video that preceded it.

The Council on American Islamic Relations got it right in their condemnation of the killings of the American diplomats, “We must not let extremists control the political or religious discourse. That means that people of all beliefs should repudiate those who would commit acts of violence in response to intentional provocations and repudiate those whose only goal is offending religious sentiments.”

We must stop this cycle of violence and hatred.

I am grateful for that the world’s religious and moral traditions have teachings that affirm respect and understanding.

For example, how did Jesus teach his followers what it means to love their neighbor? By praising the acts of the Good Samaritan—a member of a religious and ethnic group at odds with Jesus’ own Jewish community.

In Islam, the Qur’an teaches that God made humanity “into tribes and nations that you may know one another” (al-Hujurat 49:13). Not only does this verse affirm that diversity is God’s will, it also declares that our response should be understanding.

The history of the Jewish people is marked by recurring persecution, but instead of repeating this legacy of oppression, the Torah teaches, “You shall not wrong a stranger or oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. (Exodus 22:21).

As I look for a response to violence of the murders and the intolerance of the film that preceded them, I keep returning to the words of the Buddha, “Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.”

My goal is not to say that all the religions are the same. Nor is my goal to imply that only people of faith affirm religious tolerance. While there is no atheist equivalent to the Bible for me to quote, many atheists and agnostics affirm the right of all people to hold and follow their beliefs without coercion.

My point is that even as acts of intolerance, disrespect, and hatred dominate the headlines, we all have the choice to follow the teachings of inclusion and compassion in our own traditions.

These calls for respect and understanding are easy to cite; they are harder to live. We are fortunate in Ann Arbor to have so many people who strive to put these teachings into practice. Here are just a few examples:

  • Our local Habitat for Humanity chapter organized a “House of Abraham” interfaith build to bring people from different faiths together to provide low-income housing.
  • St. Clare’s Episcopal Church, Temple Beth Emeth (a Jewish Synagogue), and Muslim Social Services collaborate to address hunger through the Back Door Food Panty.
  • Jewish Social Services has helped resettle many Iraqi Muslim refugee families with housing, job, and language support.

In my own work with Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice, I bring people from different faiths and backgrounds together to work for social change. When I stand at the Capitol with a priest and an imam calling for an inquiry into U.S.-sponsored torture, I rejoice not only in the work to promote human rights, but also that this cooperation promotes tolerance and inclusion.

These efforts inspire hope in me, but I know better to get complacent. Just more than a year ago a Muslim woman in Ann Arbor was assaulted with a gun and told, “You're a terrorist. Your people should be killed.” Yes, it’s a problem here, too.

When we face assaults like the one last year and murders like the one last week, understanding and respect can seem impossible. But we can find hope in those who are reaching across differences to make a difference, we can find guidance in our own varied traditions, and together we can make a difference.

Chuck Warpehoski is the director of the Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice.

Comments

LA

Wed, Sep 19, 2012 : 2:45 p.m.

Thank you for including atheists and agnostics in your listing of groups that advocate peaceful getting along no matter what your beliefs.

a2citizen

Wed, Sep 19, 2012 : 4:37 a.m.

You mentioned a couple Jewish organizations, a Muslim service, an Episcipol church and Habitats for Humanity. What's your beef with Catholics?

Dog Guy

Wed, Sep 19, 2012 : 3:32 a.m.

Ann Arbor's city council is lax in not yet issuing a resolution in the matter of the murders and movie. Bold action must be taken by council.

John of Saline

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 8:39 p.m.

"Yes, it's a problem here, too." Relativism at its finest. That kind of event is relatively rare in the West. Now, try being Christian in Pakistan for a while. Or, worse, a Sufi. Stories of murder, rape, and assault are common, and large segments of the population let it happen, either out of fear or tacit approval. Did you know Pakistan has a Nobel Prize winning physicist? Abdus Salam. Look him up. Look up what he had to put up with for not worshiping exactly as the fundamentalists demanded. Look up what happened to his gravestone. Go ahead and claim that "it's a problem here, too." It's a typical equivalence tactic. But it's dead wrong on the facts.

Top Cat

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 6:23 p.m.

For Libya, Tunisia, Pakistan, Egypt, Afghanistan, etc.....Remove our troops, bring the diplomats home, stop sending money and then wish them good luck.

demistify

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 5:22 p.m.

"How different is that image from this year's accounts of violent attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, and from the insensitive video that preceded it." You are buying into the warped reasoning of the terrorists that any perceived affront to Islam must be avenged by extensive murder and arson throughout the world, without worrying about any connection between the victims of the violence and the offending comment. You cannot have it both ways: Do you believe that to be the appropriate interpretation of the Muslim interaction with infidels, or do you adhere to the benign view of it in your earlier quotation? The murders in Lybia and the arson and violence there and in Yemen, Egypt, etc. are political outbursts of anti-Americanism, they are recurrent and orchestrated, and the various purported "insults" (often spurious) are mere afterthoughts of the instigators. For instance, the military assault to murder the diplomats in Lybia was obviously organized and rehearsed long before the video showed up on the Internet.

demistify

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 4:09 p.m.

"How different is that image from this year's accounts of violent attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, and from the insensitive video that preceded it. " Are you equating an "insensitive video" with the murder of diplomats? Let me list some of the lapses in logic apart from the moral relativism: 1) The murdered diplomats had nothing to do with the video. 2) The US government (which they served) had nothing to do with the video. 3) If the author of the video had been murdered instead, that would still be a hate crime. 4) Theological disputation (however uncouth) is never a justification for murder and arson. 5) The First Amendment protects religious opinion. negative as well as positive.

Mike

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 8:35 p.m.

Looks like latest news reports were that they were working for the CIA trying to get weapons back from the insurgents we backed and things went badly. The video is a cover and an excuse for all of this violence. If people believe it was a video that's been on YouTube since July I've got a bridge I'd like to sell them. It takes nothing anymore to fire up the Muslim population against the USA.

John of Saline

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 8:27 p.m.

So, Mr. Warpehoski, do you believe in freedom of speech or not?

Chuck Warpehoski

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 7:55 p.m.

No, I am not. I see both as troublesome but I do not in any way think they are of equivalent severity.

Brad

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 3:52 p.m.

Ahh - he'll make a fine addition to City Council.

GoNavy

Tue, Sep 18, 2012 : 2:56 p.m.

I'd say that the solution is simply for religionistas of all shades to stop pushing their particular religion in the face of others, but that would be a waste of my time. It's not like we're fighting a multi-generation war against the atheists of the world.