You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 6 a.m.

Liberty Square owners file countersuit in Ypsilanti Township's effort to declare townhouse complex a nuisance

By Tom Perkins

Liberty_Square_January_2.jpg

The building exteriors all have been condemned in Liberty Square.

Tom Perkins | For AnnArbor.com

An attorney representing multiple Liberty Square property owners has filed a countersuit against Ypsilanti Township alleging, among other things, Fifth and 14th amendment rights violations in the township's effort to declare the townhouse complex a public nuisance.

The township's legal team and nearly 45 defendants met late last month for the initial hearing in what officials expect to be a protracted legal battle over the fate of Liberty Square, which has fallen into disrepair.

Township attorneys are asking Washtenaw County Circuit Court Judge Donald Shelton to order the 151-unit complex demolished.

A cross-suit was also filed by Don Darnell, the attorney representing the property owners and the homeowners association, against Washtenaw County Treasurer Catherine McClary. It alleges that she failed to pay association fees on 63 units her office owned following tax foreclosures in March. McClary's office was unable to sell the properties at several foreclosure auctions, and the township now owns them.

The original suit named the complex’s 45 property owners as defendants, and most were present at the Jan. 26 hearing, Township Attorney Dennis McClain said. At the hearing, Washtenaw County Circuit Judge Donald Shelton granted township officials permission to enter and inspect the complex’s vacant units. Officials estimate that at least 90 percent of the complex is uninhabited.

Shelton also ordered the homeowners association to clean up piles of debris and garbage that are piling up in parts of the complex.

“I think it was a great first step and we have our work cut out for us in terms of moving forward,” said Mike Radzik, director of the township's office of community standards. The two sides were scheduled to meet again for an evidentiary hearing March 17, but that date was delayed by Shelton.

In the countersuit, Darnell argued that an April 23 notice of violation provided by the township to the homeowners’ association did not offer specific enough information to qualify as a violation notice for each homeowner.

Darnell did not return calls from AnnArbor.com.

In the complaint, Darnell wrote that no date of inspection was provided and the notice did not “reference or identify even one address of the 151 individually owned, single-family residences.” It continued that the township copied only 15 sections of its property maintenance code and did not describe any specific problems at any specific address to support its notice of violation.

McClain declined to comment on the countersuit, though he did highlight Liberty Square's complex ownership arrangement, in which he argued that each property is not individually owned. That has been the crux of the township’s argument throughout the dispute.

Joe Koenig is the resident agent of the Grove Park Home Improvement Association. That entity owns 25 of Liberty Square’s townhouses. Koenig’s wife, Glenda Ault, is the owner of Grove Park Homes LLC, which owns 18 units. Koenig is an employee of that company. Grove Park Homes LLC used to own 81 units until the county foreclosed on them early last year.

Ault and Koenig also run JAG Properties, which has been involved in the units' management and is also named a defendant in the suit. Koenig, who has been receiving notification of problems at the complex for several years, is essentially “the person who controlled the complex for many, many years,” McClain said.

But Darnell contends that the township uses the international property maintenance code, and that set of codes requires violation notices be delivered to the person responsible for violations by certified mail, hand delivery or posting.

Because the April 23 notice of violation was delivered only to Koenig, proper notification was not given to the property owners with the exception of the Grove Park Home Improvement Association, Darnell wrote.

The complaint also states that the April 23 violation notice didn’t alert property owners that their units would be condemned if they weren’t brought up to code within 30 days. When the buildings were re-inspected by township officials and found to still have multiple violations in late May, they were condemned.

Darnell said that none of the units is unfit for human occupancy or dangerous to the “life, health, property or safety of the public” as defined by the international property maintenance code.

Darnell also took issue with an Aug. 29 addendum to the April 23 violation notice, which he argues contains only complaints over minor issues related to masonry; peeling paint; the buildings’ siding; fascia; doors; wood trim and windows. That, he said, does not constitute a threat to residents' welfare.

The complaint continues, saying that the township’s actions interfered with the owners’ abilities to use and rent their properties, causing economic damage to them. The township is responsible for those losses, Darnell argued. He also said that the township officials “intentionally and improperly” interfered with the contract and business relationships among the owners, tenants and homeowners’ association.

“Defendants have caused an unconstitutional temporary taking of counter-plaintiff’s property,” Darnell wrote, calling the condemnation fraudulent.

Darnell wrote that his allegations regarding the insufficiencies of the violation notices, the Aug. 29 addendum and the condemnation is “evidence of arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement of the law, thereby violating (counter) plaintiff’s substantive and procedural due process” under the 14th Amendment.

He is seeking monetary relief for the owners. The complaint did not specify the amount.

In the cross-suit filed against McClary, Darnell alleges McClary failed to pay approximately $130,000 in association dues while she owned 63 units from March until January. She came into possession of the units after Koenig and Ault’s Grove Park Homes went through tax foreclosure proceedings.

McClary was not available to comment this week. She is no longer a defendant in the original lawsuit because she doesn't own the properties, but she likely will be named a defendant again if her office forecloses on 34 more units in March, as expected.

McClain said McClary will likely have her own representation, but he said he disagrees with the logic that Washtenaw County taxpayers should be paying association fees to the homeowner’s association — of which Koenig is the resident agent — after Koenig’s wife and business partner, Ault, foreclosed on the homes.

He added that it is "his understanding" that Koenig and Ault didn’t regularly pay their association fees when Ault owned the 63 units.

"I assume that’s going to open a real hornets’ nest by the time the evidence comes out,” McClain said. “It would be a real windfall for them to have county tax payers paying association fees for the 63 units. I don’t believe that is something that should happen or could happen.”

Tom Perkins is a freelance reporter for AnnArbor.com. Reach the news desk at 734-623-2530 or news@annarbor.com. For more Ypsilanti stories, visit our Ypsilanti page.

Comments

Truffledog

Sun, Feb 6, 2011 : 11:32 p.m.

116 Units affordable housing wasted. This was another slow motion disaster that has been in full swing since at least 2003. Where was the Washtenaw Housing Alliance the last eight years? No amount of new housing makes up for letting existing housing fall to pieces.

Michigan Reader

Sat, Feb 5, 2011 : 4:13 p.m.

The McClain-Winters law firm should advise the township building inspector on how to properly give notice of violations, the taxpayers of Washtenaw County don't owe a dime in association fees, because they never owned the properties, the township taxpayers don't owe a dime in fees because they never owned the properties. The citizens and their governments are two separate entities. For example, citizens aren't bound by constitutional protections.

Nick P.

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 11:25 p.m.

Liberty Square was platted as a subdivision. It is not a traditional true condominium. The association, through its board of directors, is required in its bylaws to carry insurance on the entire condominium complex. The insurance is supposed to pay for the rebuilding of the entire unit, exterior and interior. During the past several years two units(both on Morris ) were severely damaged by fire but for some reason one unit was partially rebuilt, the other unit was never repaired. It remains boarded up. The individual owners most probably do not carry mortgages. Most properties are sold through land contracts. No banks would lend to them. Some of the larger owners with many properties were somehow able to bundle their own properties together and to get one large mortgage. This was when mortgage loans were easy to get before the real estate market tanked and property values fell in 2008.

YpsiLivin

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:51 p.m.

Many questions, few answers. If the township is the majority owner of units in the complex: - why do they need a judge's permission to enter their own properties to inspect them ... - why doesn't the township wait until the pending 34 foreclosures revert to the township ... - why doesn't the township buy out the few remaining owners ... ...and then tear the whole mess down? The township could recover all of its expenses when it sells the property for redevelopment. The fair market value of these properties is close to $0, so the buyout route should be much more attractive for everyone involved than the lawyer route, which produces nothing other than a lot of unrecoverable expenses.

Jim Knight

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:25 p.m.

Two off-topic comments were removed.

Bill

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:09 p.m.

From what I understand, condo associations are responsible for collecting and assessing fees to residence and then prioritizing expenditures, e.g. maintenance, improvements etc. Clearly, the association dropped the ball, which normally consists of residence willing to take on the responsibilities. Clearly, someone dropped the ball, but it was not, repeat, not the county unless of course a majority of the condos were in fact section 8, in which case the county would have culpability if funds were not paid out to residences in a timely fashion. No, to me, it is clear that the residence let the place slip into desolation and ruin.

jondhall

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:04 p.m.

Some respondents sound like parrots , you know what they are going to say before they open their mouths . First off Don Darnell , not a famous attorney by no means should move in this complex if he feels it is ok . Secondly this is going to make one law firm allot of money , we know who McClain - Winters . Since the form of ownership here is so unusual no one can describe it , we shall let the Judge decide , at least we have a very good one in Judge Shelton . No matter the outcome here the people lose , the law firm wins . Where is William Shakespeare ? The place needs to be condemned and so does the person that set up this form of ownership !

Barb's Mom

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:01 p.m.

@ Andy The home owners should just walk away? Why don't you just walk away from your mortgage and see how easy it is to get another one.

Soothslayer

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 11:43 p.m.

What's the priority? Its not safe to live there. Being there endangers emergency responders lives that may have to put themselves at risk to assist at this location. Sorry it didnt work out but these folks need to move on.

Atticus F.

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 2:41 p.m.

I agree with MB11. Ypsi township has been out of controll lately in violating people property rights. And I for one, hope they get their pants sued off. Apparently thats the only way to reason with them... by way of lawsuit.

Bill

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 3:12 p.m.

A lawsuit at this point is like crying over dumped milk, it won't bring the milk back. The only issue here is: Did the Condo residents dump the glass or the county?

MB111

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 1:51 p.m.

@Andy So the individual owners should just walk away from years of mortgage payments, get nothing and move? Its far more complicated than your "just walk" solution. Clearly there has been mismanagement by the association, individual owners, the multi-unit owners as well as the township. This complex did not fall into disrepair overnight - the township has some culpability in this as well.

Steve Hendel

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 2:45 p.m.

...and the township's culpability is...? It seems to me they are the only ones doing anything now, no matter what has happened in the past. I live in a condo community, and here any unpaid Association Fees are a lien against the individual property. In the case of Liberty Square, it would seem as if (assuming Association Fees are treated likewise) the County, holding title, is liable for them just as they would be for any other liens against the property

Soothslayer

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 12:39 p.m.

Honestly "home"owners just walk away This entire facility is beyond repair and dangerous. Since you live in between or near units that have been stripped, not kept up or vandalized it puts you and your families at serious risk. Continuing to stay there also puts emergency responders at unnecessary risk so you are putting them in harms way too. Do any of these residents even have homeowners insurance? I can't believe anyone would underwrite such a fire trap and risk. Just let it go already and find another place to live before you are forced out. Sorry but its the best for everyone.

bugjuice

Fri, Feb 4, 2011 : 2:18 p.m.

Wow, Andy has the answer for everything! It's all so simple. The people who lived there can just walk away into the cold not knowing where to go or what could happen to them. Tough luck for them. Too bad so sad. The "owners" on the other hand will be able to walk away after years of neglect and having taken what they can from the property while it crumbled. I wonder if the "owners" received any government subsidies or tax breaks over the years? I wonder where they live and the condition of their homes? Welcome to the new world order! We're in for ourselves and screw everyone else!