You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 5:59 a.m.

Going green: Solar panels, LED lights, new energy program win support of Ann Arbor City Council

By Ryan J. Stanton

Ann Arbor took three steps toward being greener Monday night with the City Council's unanimous approval to install solar panels on the roof of a city fire station, to purchase 500 new LED streetlights and to launch a new energy efficiency program for businesses.

Crews will install solar electric and solar thermal systems at Fire Station No. 6, located near Briarwood Mall, after the council approved $51,480 contract with Huron Valley Electric.

The company will install the 8-kilowatt solar photovoltaic system and a solar domestic hot water system in early June. The project is funded entirely by the city's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Main_Street_downtown_LED_street_lights.jpg

LED street lights illuminate Main Street in downtown Ann Arbor.

Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

The electric system is expected to produce $1,000 annually in electricity and the hot water system is expected to meet 55 percent of the station's hot water needs, for an annual savings of $430. Electricity would be used to offset the fire station's electric use on sunny days.

The city is purchasing the photovoltaic collectors for the project separately from the construction contract with Huron Valley Electric. Andrew Brix, the city's energy programs manager, said that's because the manufacturer, Uni-Solar, has agreed to sell solar collectors at a greatly reduced cost to the city based on its Solar America Cities Partnership.

Brix said the panels themselves should be under $27,000, though that hasn't been finalized. Those are being paid for with the same federal grant. Additionally, DTE Energy's SolarCurrents rebate will cover about $20,000 of the total system cost, Brix said.

Many more energy efficiency improvements throughout the city will be made possible under a new program that received initial support from the City Council Monday night.

The council voted to establish a $482,800 loan loss reserve fund to be used in conjunction with the city's new Property Assessed Clean Energy program that's under development.

Funds were previously budgeted from the city's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for this purpose.

Ann Arbor officials fought for the passage of the state's new PACE law, which was signed by outgoing Gov. Jennifer Granholm in December.

The new law gives local governments authority to issue revenue bonds to pay for upgrades on private property, ranging from high-efficiency furnaces that can cost a few thousand dollars to solar-panel systems that can cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Property owners are responsible for repaying the loans from their local governments over a period of several years through special assessments added to their property tax bills.

Brix said the PACE program is being set up so the estimated energy savings must be greater than the cost of the special assessment — meaning it'll be an immediate cost savings for the property owner. The way the law is currently worded, it only applies to businesses for now.

Ann Arbor officials hope to see it extended to residents.

Brix said the loan loss reserve fund will allow the city to leverage 10 times as much private funding for PACE projects and reduce interest rates for participating property owners by covering a portion of delinquent or defaulted payments.

"I think that folks will see that Ann Arbor will be moving certainly faster than many other communities," said Mayor John Hieftje, championing the PACE program Monday night. "Again, we've had so much to do with getting this program up and running, and we've already put a great deal of work in, and I'll be very happy to see when it actually takes off."

The council also showed its support Monday night for a $315,968 purchase of 500 new LED "cobra head" streetlight fixtures from Farmington Hills-based Lumecon LLC.

The new lights will be installed on the arterial roads in the city, which city officials say is the third and final phase of the LED conversion process for city-owned streetlights.

However, many of the street lights in Ann Arbor are owned by DTE Energy and the city remains in talks with the company about converting those.

In order to achieve energy and maintenance savings, the city began converting all city-owned streetlights to LED fixtures in 2007. Crews began with the conversion of 1,000 downtown streetlights through a grant from the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority.

In June 2010, the City Council authorized moving on to Phase II of the LED-conversion process for the remaining 800 city-owned streetlights. The city was able to purchase 250 LED cobra head fixtures, which are in the process of being installed. Tonight's resolution would approve the installation of another 500 over the course of eight months.

The city expects to see a 50-70 percent savings in energy and maintenance.

Ryan J. Stanton covers government and politics for AnnArbor.com. Reach him at ryanstanton@annarbor.com or 734-623-2529.

Comments

xmo

Tue, Aug 21, 2012 : 12:42 p.m.

First, what is the purpose of going "GREEN" except to make you feel good! Second, the savings on all of this "Green Stuff" is certainly over stated (50-70% ?). Third, the Return on Investment (ROI) is very long and probably overstated also. Fourth, We are spending Federal Tax Dollars to do this. Who pays the Federal taxes? So, what is the point of "GOING GREEN" Remember there are at least 40 NASA "ROCKET Scientist" who do not believe in "Man Made Global Warming" on record.

BobbyJohn

Wed, Mar 9, 2011 : 4:24 p.m.

Drive around town and see how many streetlights are on 24/7, while city workers drive pat them hundreds of times/day. As we speak, all the exterior lights at the new county building on N. Main st. are on 24/7, after years of my reporting this to the county, while Conan Smith talks about spending large sums of money on energy conservation. Pick the low hanging fruit first, do what is simple before spending tens of thousands on energy savings that take decades to break even.

Jennifer

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 8:12 p.m.

Here are some energy-saving tips for your home: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUNISl0mr5g" rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUNISl0mr5g</a>

ann_arbor_guy

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 6:12 p.m.

I am so proud of our leaders investing in Ann Arbor's future like this. I believe that making investments like these upgrades that lower the overall operational costs of the city are exactly the kind of investments this city needs. Especially when you read in the news about cities turning off city lights to save money, this will keep our lights on and safer and let us use the savings for other improvements to the city.

L. C. Burgundy

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 4:53 p.m.

Absent heavy government tax-and-subsidize, solar panels have payback periods ranging from 30 to 50 years. We're nowhere near it actually being a practical means of energy generation, greenwashing aside.

Rork Kuick

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 2:06 p.m.

&quot;The city expects to see a 50-70 percent savings in energy and maintenance.&quot; A good report would have said what that is in terms of dollars per year so we can compute how good the investment is. ( I think it may not be bad.)

andys

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 1:52 p.m.

I doubt you could make an economic argument for these solar panels. These are feel good measures, like buying a hybrid car, since the extra up front cost is so high there is never any payback. I just don't know that this is the best use of our funds, considering the economic challenges we are just not beginning to face. I think that in a few years, we will face some dire economic times, and will look back and ask how we could have been so foolish to squander money like this. Good day!

Macabre Sunset

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 1:11 p.m.

The state of Arizona just passed a resolution condemning Ann Arbor for wasting money on pricey LED streetlights and purchasing prime real estate to not do what no one else would do during a recession anyway. (no, the joke never gets old).

Edward Vielmetti

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 6:44 p.m.

I believe that @Macabre Sunset is making a joke, but just in case; 8 Borders in Arizona are closing, with 5 staying open <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/business/news/articles/2011/02/17/20110217biz-borders0217.html" rel='nofollow'>http://www.azcentral.com/business/news/articles/2011/02/17/20110217biz-borders0217.html</a> and the previous coverage of Ann Arbor's city council on Arizona laws <a href="http://www.annarbor.com/news/ann-arbor-city-council-adopts-resolution-opposing-arizonas-controversial-new-immigration-law/">http://www.annarbor.com/news/ann-arbor-city-council-adopts-resolution-opposing-arizonas-controversial-new-immigration-law/</a> and just to say on topic, the Arizona Solar Energy Association <a href="http://www.arizonasolarenergy.org/" rel='nofollow'>http://www.arizonasolarenergy.org/</a> (they get a lot more sun in Arizona than we do here).

WesternTownie

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 6:07 p.m.

I am trying to find an article about this, do you have a link to where you found it?? Thanks.

Soothslayer

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:47 p.m.

With the lack of sun solar panels won't be nearly as efficient means of energy production as finding a way to use all the hot air from City Council.

TT

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:45 p.m.

A few dim bulbs lighting the way in AA?

Rodney

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:20 p.m.

Ann Arbor council is stupid, they dont check into stuff before they act, for one thing it has done been proven that Led Street Lights pose a threat to accidents, regular street lights heat up so it will melt snow and ice from the lights so they stay clear all the time, Led dont get hot so when it snows or get an ice storm who is going to every light and take the snow and ice off of them, no one will see the lights which in turn will cause accidents etc, Ann Arbor think about this before you move.

AfterDark

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 2:53 p.m.

The LED streetlights I've seen so far are much brighter with a whiter light than the old lights, too. Drive down Turnberry some night (south off of Packard west of Carpenter) and you'll see them.

murph

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 1:30 p.m.

Rodney, I believe you're thinking of led &quot;traffic signals&quot; (red / yellow / green), which did have some such problems with early models, but the discussion here is of led street lights - the white or yellow overhead lights above the roadway.

cinnabar7071

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:55 p.m.

Good thing cars have headlights so that will never be a point, except for when making excusses as to why you crashed your car. A yeah I coundn't see, the street light was covered in snow.

Soothslayer

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:50 p.m.

The retrofit LED street lamps are MUCH more efficient and maintenance free than the originals and contribute to far less light polution because the shine downward where people and vehicles are. Snow usually falls and sticks to the top of the lamps, not the sides or bottom.

average joe

Tue, Mar 8, 2011 : 12:20 p.m.

At a total installed cost of $78,000, it would only take 54 years to re-coup these costs based on the $1430 annual savings in electricity. Green projects like these are so pricey, only the government can afford it....