Road Commission says two new disaster warning sirens in Dexter Township need to relocate
A "breakdown of communication" between the Washtenaw County Road Commission, Dexter Township officials and a contracting company means two new disaster warning sirens installed in December must be relocated.
Dexter Township entered into a $370,000 contract with Front Line Plus Inc., of Monticello, Minn., for the installation of 16 new disaster warning sirens, prompted by the tornado that swept through the area in March 2012.
A new disaster warning signal installed on Waterloo Road in Dexter Township that Washtenaw County Road Commission officials say must be moved because it's too close to the road.
Courtesy of Washtenaw County Road Commission
However, four of the sirens that were installed in Dexter Township are within a right-of-way area and closer to the road than they should be, per the Road Commission. Front Line Plus requested the Road Commission waive its requirements that the poles be a minimum of 28 feet from the center line of a road.
"As I am sure the Road Commission knows, installing 60-foot poles with sirens and solar power in a foliage-rich area combined with countless underground utilities, made this project a challenge," Green wrote in a Jan. 20 letter to the Road Commission.
Roy Townsend, director of the Road Commission, granted the company a waiver for one of the sirens by written letter and waived the requirements for another of the siren locations at an April 17 meeting of the Road Commission.
Two of the sirens must be moved because they're far too close to the road, Townsend said, noting they're about eight feet from the edge of the roadway:
- Siren number 10 on Donner Road south of Colby Road
- Siren number 13 on Waterloo Road east of Werkner Road
“At the end of the day, the company put them in the wrong location,” Townsend said.
Townsend said the company started installing the sirens prior to getting the proper permits for the work.
Dexter Township officials were under the impression that the permits had been issued for the work, but that the contractor didn’t have them in hand when they started installing the sirens, said township clerk Harley Rider.
“There was a breakdown of communication,” Rider said.
Green of Front Line Plus declined to comment, and deferred to Rider on the issue.
The location of the sirens were marked by the company and a representative of the township's Public Safety Advisory Committee, which initially was reviewed by the Road Commission, Rider said.
The contractor installed the siren on Waterloo Road in a different location than it was marked, Rider said.
"The contractor put it closer to the road than we had it marked," Rider said.
Miscommunication about the location of private property and the right-of-way area at the Donner Road site caused the contractor to install the pole in a place that was marked but ended up being incorrect, Rider said.
Front Line Plus likely will pay for the relocation of the Waterloo Road siren, Rider said. Rider expects Front Line Plus to ask the township to pay for part or all of the relocation of the Donner Road siren.
"I would have the tendency to agree," Rider said. "The information that everyone had at the time wasn't complete. ... It was a breakdown of communication between all parties."
Amy Biolchini covers Washtenaw County, health and environmental issues for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at (734) 623-2552, amybiolchini@annarbor.com or on Twitter.
Comments
rouzer
Mon, Jul 8, 2013 : 8:22 p.m.
Are they moving the one on Donner Rd. AGAIN? They already had to move it back in the spring shortly after it was installed.
Mark
Mon, Apr 22, 2013 : 1:13 p.m.
Sounds like Dexter's Challenger Field. I'd love to know what went on behind that project.
zip the cat
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 6:24 p.m.
Site plan,not dexter twp They shoot from the hip on everything they do They lost 5K on the failed fire station land deal because of there lawyer and board members had there head in the sand and forgot anout the deadline. Its called checks and balances for ALL projects and have a person to oversee the completion of said project ,a real simple request Something they know nothing about
justcurious
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 9:18 p.m.
I would like to know who is on their Public Safety Advisory Committee. They were involved with the firestation debacle as well.
Tag
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 6:18 p.m.
Just gotta ask is the township clerks name really "Harley Rider"?
jackdaniels
Mon, Apr 22, 2013 : 5:14 a.m.
yeah and he drives a prius, sad story,
yohan
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 7:48 p.m.
Naw .... That's just his nick name. His real name is Honda Walker
tom swift jr.
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 6:26 p.m.
yep....
Shawn Letwin
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 6:01 p.m.
@tdw-exactly! Mr. Rider said as much and you don't hear that too often from elected/public officials. Anyway, Mr. Rider seems to be an oasis of accountability compared to what is typically found. It sounds like everyone is making the best of an unintended outcome and has some shared cooperation. Negligence; in the narrowest definition of the word. Intended,;seems not. Cooperation; most certainly! Learned lesson...absolutely.
Billy
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 5:57 p.m.
"Dexter Township entered into a $370,000 contract with Front Line Plus Inc., of Monticello, Minn." Why wasn't a local company used? Not accusing of any wrongdoing...just wondering why they didn't source a local company instead.
Fat Bill
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 5:55 p.m.
A close study of the picture above indicates dozens of trees that are "far too close" to the roadway as well. Is it really that much more dangerous given the surroundings? This is publicly owned equipment in a publicly owned right-of-way...
Ann English
Wed, May 8, 2013 : 10:53 p.m.
As long as those trees are alive, leave them there. Level land, no canopy of foliage over the road during the spring and summer, are probably preferred places for those sirens, whether in cities, suburbs or rural areas.
Bob W
Mon, Apr 22, 2013 : 2:13 p.m.
Some trees do appear to be closer, but they've been there a while. I can see NOT introducing new threats.
tdw
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 5:10 p.m.
Ok...I'm really kinda, sorta, but not really sorry about this but I have to do it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWUBHA2DBDA
Nicholas Urfe
Sun, Apr 21, 2013 : 5:02 p.m.
This is why we have regulations, inspections, and enforcement. Those especially apply to government projects. So, where is the site plan? And the signoff? Someone was negligent here and the taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it. If taxpayers must pay, then someone in government must be held accountable - and not a "grunt", but a manager. What allowed this to happen, and how will it be prevented in the future?