Washtenaw County sheriff's deputy accused of indecent exposure, soliciting sex
A Washtenaw County sheriff’s deputy was arrested Monday, accused of exposing himself to an Adrian massage therapist in January, then soliciting sex from her, authorities said.
Deputy Chad Jeremy Beaudin, 38, was arraigned Monday in 2A District Court in Adrian on charges of aggravated indecent exposure and soliciting prostitution, Adrian Deputy Police Chief Laurence Van Alstine said. He turned himself in at police headquarters Monday morning, Van Alstine said.
Chad Beaudin
Beaudin is out on a personal recognizance bond, said his attorney, Michael Vincent.
“We intend to present a vigorous defense to these charges,” Vincent said. “It’s easy to make accusations.”
Beaudin's wife, a Lenawee County sheriff's deputy, is "unquestionably standing by him," Vincent said.
Beaudin has been on unpaid leave since March 11 when the Sheriff’s Department learned charges were filed, said Derrick Jackson, the department’s director of community engagement. He was initially put on paid leave Feb. 2, Jackson said. Beaudin has been with the department for at least nine years, most recently assigned to the western portion of the county. An internal investigation into the matter continues.
On Jan. 27, Adrian police say Beaudin was nude as he received a massage about 12:30 p.m. at Defined Wellness Center, a massage therapy business on West Maple Avenue.
Beaudin was on his back with a blanket covering his genitals, a police report said. It was moved slightly to allow the therapist to work on his upper thigh muscle, the report said.
As she massaged his thigh, he “moved the blanket,” the report said, exposing himself. She covered him up and continued to massage his thigh, the report said.
According to the report, when she switched to the other leg, Beaudin "kicked off the blanket," and it landed on the floor.
She started to massage his foot, when he "began to masturbate," the report said. He attempted to grab her right hand with his left hand, but she "stepped back and immediately ended the session," the report said.
She asked Beaudin if he had any questions, the report said, when he requested she touch his genitals. She declined, so he offered her a tip, according to the report.
When she declined again, Beaudin asked if he could continue to touch himself, the report said. That's when she left the room, according to the report. The business later sent Beaudin a letter asking him not to return.
The victim told police she was "confused" and "scared" after the incident, the report said. When she left the room, she let other employees deal with Beaudin as she hid in another room, the report said.
She said Beaudin had been a client since 2008 and she was aware of his "status as a law enforcement officer," the report said.
The victim came forward two days after the incident after consulting with her parents and boss, she told police. She said what Beaudin did was not right and that cops are supposed to "help you, not hurt you," the report said.
During a Feb. 2 telephone interview with Adrian police Det. Vincent Emrick, Beaudin said he was nude during the massage, but denied doing anything illegal, a transcript of the interview shows.
"I just received a massage..." Beaudin told Emrick. "I definitely would not come back if I offended somebody so - I'm totally shocked and embarassed, but as far as anything criminal ... No."
Lee Higgins covers crime and courts for AnnArbor.com. He can be reached by phone at (734) 623-2527 and email at leehiggins@annarbor.com.
Comments
Anonymous Due to Bigotry
Sun, Mar 21, 2010 : 12:50 a.m.
Speaking of poor journalism and jumping to conclusions, shouldn't all instances of "the victim" in this story be replaced with "the alleged victim"? Sounds like Lee Higgins has already convicted the guy.
wln15
Fri, Mar 19, 2010 : 2:20 p.m.
Whatever happened to simply telling someone "No?" Please, no lie detector test. I'd rather have taxpayer money spent on real issues...not some guy that wanted a fantasy fulfilled. (reportedly;)
ArianneRose
Fri, Mar 19, 2010 : 10:32 a.m.
People need to remember that the court system in our country allows that people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. When we read an account of an event in a newspaper or internet or hear it on tv, we have to realize that the reporter who wrote the story wrote down facts as they see them, however the piece could be slanted as well. I am not condemning reporters by any means, but you have to go to court to get the real story. If you were a defendant, would you want people to convict you in a newspaper,tv etc. or would you want to be tried in a court of law? This protection is for all of us. That is why jurors are not allowed to watch tv or read newspaper accounts of trials. Put yourself in the other person's shoes. For instance, you are accused of something but are in fact innocent.(This is not my opinion in this case, but I am sure most people reading would never imagine they are a defendant who is guilty of something.)Think how you would feel if you were walking free (on bail or free in your own recognizance) and people ostracised you w/o knowing the true facts. You are being unfairly tried before your day in court. I do not know what happened. None of us do. I am going to keep an open mind in this case as well as any other. In this as in all cases, I hope to see justice served.
PR of AA
Thu, Mar 18, 2010 : 10 a.m.
If the Deputy is innocent unfortunately he will still live with this for the rest of his professional career. Just another example of Guilty until proven innocent, he already has his name in the paper and obviously some peoples minds are already made up. Give this person the benefit of the doubt, and remember he could be the one to save your life!!!!
Dave66
Wed, Mar 17, 2010 : 9:19 p.m.
Maybe the woman is brave, standing up for herself. Maybe not. Maybe she's a freak with a narcissistic personality disorder and wants to wreak havoc in someone's life. Maybe his mind wandered into an inappropriate area when she massaged his thigh, he got embarrassed by his physical response and made a joke. There are so many, many possibilities. It's interesting how we all read the exact same information and come to so many different conclusions. Everyone here is equally ignorant about what actually happened, yet so many are quite convinced they know enough to support one side or the other. Some people here are thoughtful and consider all the options. Others have knee-jerk reactions so violent I can only assume you blackened your own eye. Judging by most of the comments here, I really hope that most of you never serve on a jury. Any jury, anywhere, for any reason.
Mick52
Wed, Mar 17, 2010 : 1:16 p.m.
As noted correctly by Dave (way above) and Atticus, there are massage parlors-houses of prostitution, and massage therapy a licensed legitimate physical therapy practice. Perhaps the customer here was confused in where he was.
djm12652
Wed, Mar 17, 2010 : 12:23 p.m.
@Chai...after I stopped laughing...I wanted to tell you...yes..you are right! :o)
Kstar
Wed, Mar 17, 2010 : 11:06 a.m.
Nudeity is not required, it is a comfort measure. The only thing that is ever massaged that would be hidden by under-garments is the glutes- Largest muscle of your body! Lots of people prefer to get totally undressed to avoid getting any massage oil or cream on their clothing. It is possible that he waited for a while to pull something like this because he was under the impression that he was a valued customer... Anonymus- How can you claim that the victim has a mental disorder? Do you personally know her? If it is wrong to condem Mr. Beudin solely on this womans remarks, then how do you justify condeming this woman solely on his?! I do not think that anyone would make something like this up, especially against a Deputy who will probably get off with nothing. She is a very brave woman who is fighting for her justice, and standing up to say that she will not be taken advantage of. We should be proud of her, not sit here and belittle her.
Anonymous Due to Bigotry
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 11:16 p.m.
trespass: I think we know that there's a movement to deny due process to men accused of rape. After all, any sort of defense is going to "re-victimize" the alleged victim by actually asking questions about the alleged victim's behavior. I've actually had people seriously try to tell me that what would be considered normal criminal defense in the case of any violent act constitutes "re-victimization" of an alleged rape victim in the case of rape. Seriously, I don't see how, by this definition, anyone can be entitled to a defense. We might as well just go ahead and convict accused rapists without a trial. One of the problems with rape is that 90% of rapes are by an acquaintance, and women with a reputation for being sexually promiscuous are statistically more likely to be raped. Just as it is possible to provoke a non-sexual physical assault, it is also possible to provoke a sexual assault. (Provoking an assault of any sort does not excuse the assault and does not place "blame" on the victim, but it is taken into consideration when it comes to certain things, such as sentencing, as it should be.) It seems to me like massage parlors should have some sort of written policy for the massage therapists on how they're supposed to respond to attempts to solicit sex from them. If establishments have such procedures, and employees follow them, then that should help to eliminate any sort of situation where it's unclear what's going on and should hopefully serve to legally protect the establishments and employees.
L'chaim
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 8:02 p.m.
But the real question on everyone's mind, the concern we all share is, will this story have a happy ending? Am I right?
Matt Cooper
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 7:44 p.m.
Snapshot: In response to your claims about eyewitness acounts, you should know that any good prosecutor knows that 'eyewitnesses' are the worst evidence of crime. Memories can easily be skewed by outside factors such as mental or emotional trauma, others input, questioning by police among may other factors. And when you couple this with the fact that apparantly there were no independant witnesses to the actual event, well...good luck getting a conviction.
BenWoodruff
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 7:09 p.m.
Good thing he doesn't work for Milan P.D. Chief Lewis and the Mayor would have him fired already!
huh7891
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 5:13 p.m.
Did anyone ever consider he may have been working undercover? No seriously,. Whole story sound strange to me..... something is just not right..wonder if the woman got caught doing something she shouldn't have been doing and is now trying to turn it on the client.
Lokalisierung
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 4:39 p.m.
"What are we doing guilty until proven innocent in Ann Arbor now???" On these boards it's usually that way. Look at the Freeman case. So many ripping him every time there was an update and that case eventually got thrown out.
sheepdog1
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 4:33 p.m.
And the accusations fly. Were any of you called as witnesses? Any of you on the jury yet? Funny how there are no judges in Lenawee that want to hear this case were you at arraignment? This is bigger than one person, who else is involved? What are we doing guilty until proven innocent in Ann Arbor now???
Nosmo King
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 3:22 p.m.
"He has one of the BEST lawyers working for him, should be interesting to see how this case ends!" There will be no happy ending.
Lokalisierung
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 2:50 p.m.
No. I thought there was a confidentiality between the two of us. There was no solicitation. Thats all I can say, Beaudin told the detective, according to a transcript of the conversation." Hmmm...that puts a little weird slant on things.
mi4198
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 2:44 p.m.
If this guy did it he shouldn't be a police officer. If he didn't do it than the business should apologize to him and the woman should be charged for filing a false police report.
Sling Blade
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 2:40 p.m.
http://www.lenconnect.com/news/courts/x99751768/Washtenaw-deputy-charged-with-soliciting-massage-therapist
breadman
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 1:36 p.m.
Come on.. Law enforcement Personal do not break the law. The Law follows them. Don't women do stupid things too make the headlings? Always a Male figure fills the paper.
Grand Marquis de Sade
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 12:46 p.m.
If the Washtenaw County Sheriff's Dept. pursues this with the same vigor as they do the Michigan Avenue miscreants, as stonecutter suggested, there will be absolutely no consequences whatsoever.
Atticus F.
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 12:37 p.m.
The moral of the story, is that alot of police officers have a belief that massage places are nothing but a front for prostitution. Let this be a lesson...Not all masseuses are prostitutes, most are legitimate.
Lokalisierung
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 12:10 p.m.
"She started to massage his foot, when he "began to masturbate," Ummm yeah...it's called a massage!
Rae
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 11:52 a.m.
OK, people, this is very important information, and this is mostly in answer to one response below. I speak as a massage therapist of 7 years who has practiced in spas and two medical offices in Washtenaw County. To the person who suggests that the clinic was wrong to allow clients to be nude under the blankets: it is very standard and acceptable for clients to remain nude underneath a sheet and one or more blankets! When draped properly, this allows for only the part of the body being worked on to be exposed, and for nothing to "peek out" on men or women. In many cases, if it is a spa, the client may have just come from salt scrub or hydrotherapy treatment (both treatments clients go totally nude, even given the option to have underwear on, but who wants to take a bath in your bra and underwear? Almost everyone chooses to go nude) and will be only wearing a robe. Even if someone is coming in just for a massage therapy session, well hey, not everyone even wears underwear at all in their daily life! Since I drape properly I don't care, and often don't even know, if clients are wearing underwear or not. I'm not ever aiming to uncover those spots so it doesn't even add into the equation. If anything, if men are wearing boxers, it is a bit difficult to get to the upper thigh, and I have to ask the client to pull the leg of the boxers up. I am worried that someone wants the clinic investigated for allowing nudity, when it is standard industry practice. Please do your research before saying such things. With all of that said, I have only once in my career as a full time therapist (and I have done thousands of massages!) had a man ask for anything inappropriate. I very sternly told him I didn't do that, no one at our establishment did that, and if he mentioned it again I was going to end the session and he would be responsible for paying the full price of the massage. And I didn't say it that nicely! He shut up immediately, I finished the session, and afterwards he threw some money at the front desk and ran out! And wouldn't you know, his wife was a regular there, too...Some people just aren't very bright! Reading this news story, I was a bit confused. It seemed as if the therapist should have been very stern with him with the very first exposure, if the exposure was intentional and not a result of improper draping. She should have either dealt with the issue right then or ended the session. The story made it seem like it went on for a little bit, but then again I am reading a journalistic account of an incident based on reports, tidbits, and a few quotes. Who knows how it all actually went?
pegret
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 11:37 a.m.
Unfortunately, this IS a case of "he-said, she-said". Perhaps it would be a good idea for legitimate businesses using massage therapy to have cameras...for all concerned.
DagnyJ
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 11:28 a.m.
Zulu, I get it. I defended an unjustly accused employee so I know what a smear looks like. OTOH, what if the massage therapist is telling the truth?
KeepingItReal
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 10:51 a.m.
Dagny J: Again. Is there concrete evidence from this person or past Masseuse regarding the inappropriateness of this man's behavior. Anyone can make an allegation like this without there being any proof to substantiate it. As a matter of fact, this is becoming common place in the work environment for such accusations to be made. Its not unusual when something of this nature to break for mass hysteria to take place in which people who have unresolved issues report similar experiences. However, do they have concrete evidence this officer behaved in an inappropriate way. If he's guilty, then so be it but I would hate to see someone's life ruined because of an unsubstantiated allegation.
delete this profile
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 10:47 a.m.
Agree with others who say more information is needed but I do think that her behavior/reaction seems a little odd. Wouldn't you tell the man to leave after the first time he intentionally revealed himself? If she didn't have the guts to speak up, at least leave the room...there were other people in the office.
Craig Lounsbury
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 10:33 a.m.
Maybe they both could volunteer to take a lie detector test. Of the 4 possible outcomes 2 would provide a pretty good indicator.
Wolverine3660
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 10:06 a.m.
This might just turn out to be a fiasco like the infamous "Duke Lacrosse Team case". In that case, all feminists and liberals and progressives lined up against the Duke Mens LAX team, even though, it was quite obvious that the accuser was lying. I would guess that some of the comments would remind me of the "believe the woman's account, regardless of the evidence" mindset. Experienced cops will tell you that, yes, many women do make up false accusations of sexual assault or false reports of other criminal sexual conduct. So, lets wait till all the evidence comes out,and the trial happens, before passing judgement
snapshot
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 9:51 a.m.
I could be mistaken but there are convictions based upon eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evedence. Some 250 of those conviceted later proved to be innocent based upon DNA evidence later analyzed. So "he said, she said" isn't something to be taken lightly.
Matt Cooper
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 9:50 a.m.
EyeHeartA2: No need to be condescending. As a matter of fact, I started by saying "And just for argument sake, let's assume you are correct in what the UM is trying to do."
KeepingItReal
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 9:40 a.m.
Dagny J: Let me be very clear about this. I'm not blaming or defending anyone in this situation but I find it very disconcerting that you would flat out state that you believe this person on the basis that he is a cop and that she was brave to make this type of allegation. It doesn't take much for someone to make an allegation of this nature especially if she felt that with him being a cop, he may have been trying to set her up for a bust. Many people have been falsely convicted just because people like you believed an allegation not based on any clear cut evidence but just because. I would hate to see this gentleman convicted on a preponderance rather that factual evidence. Is there a video or audio of the incident? Did anyone else witness this? He's been attending this facility since 2008. Has anyone else had this experience with him. Is it common place for females to give massages to nude men? Are there standards in place to address the conduct of the masseuse or the client and are there clear guidelines for reporting inappropriate behavior? These are the kinds of questions I would ask and I'm sure his attorney will be asking also.
djm12652
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 9:31 a.m.
Does anyone besides me smell a civil lawsuit here? I'm not a lawyer, but the acusation and "evidence" [what the masseuse said vs the client] doesn't seem enough to present itself in court...furthermore, innocent until proven guilty...remember that folks...and to "snapshot"...you forgot about the Prosecuting Attorney in Ann Arbor with the DUI...
Tammy
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 9:11 a.m.
It is absolutely crazy that someone can make this kind of acusation without any kind of proof!!! I have a problem with her story with regard to him grabbing her hand and then masterbating...she says she asked him if he had any questions? REALLY!!! Why the hell didn't she run out immediately inform her coworkers that there was a freak in the room and to call police!!! Where is the dna evidense if he masterbated.....BECAUSE he didn't....it is her work against his! All you police officers out there better beware....you could all be victims of this kind of acuasation some day....anyone could say anything and bring charges if you are a cop...everyone wants to see a cop go down...I am furious! Open your eyes everyone and see this for what it is...and I hope they check out her background...if they do they may see who they are really dealing with!!
Matt Cooper
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 8:49 a.m.
Oh and one other thing. I have a few friends that are professional massage therapists, and they tell me it's not at all unusual for their clients to be totally nude and only covered with a towel during a massage. So to try to make the nudity an issue is nonsensical.
Matt Cooper
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 8:45 a.m.
Trespass, I'm wondering where you get your information. And just for argument sake, let's assume you are correct in what the UM is trying to do. Their student code of conduct has nothing whatever to do with the laws of the State of Michigan. Secondly, changing a policy to make it so the standard of evidence needed for conviction is nothing more than a preponerance (meaning he more likely than not committed the crime in question) would be ludacrous, and in the event that any student, male or female, was discharged from the University based on that standard of evidence this would open the University up to lawsuits such as you have never seen. Check your sources, check your information and use a little common sense.
stunhsif
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 8:04 a.m.
I agree with Matt Cooper. It is a "she said-he said" case. Unless there if video footage there is no way I would convict in this case. Something probably did happen but again there is never going to be any proof and without that, you cannot convict.
Griffen
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 7:44 a.m.
Perhaps Washtenaw County sheriffs deputy Chad Jeremy Beaudin confused a legitimate massage therapy office with one of these so-called massage parlors with happy endings, that seem to dot central and western Michigan? I see the ads while driving to and from Chicago around Adrian and Jackson along the highway. While he should have known better, we as a state need to be more vigilant in wiping out brothels in Michigan!
DagnyJ
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 7:17 a.m.
I would never have a male massage therapist. So why did this guy have a woman? I support and believe her. Accusing a cop of this sucks for her, and won't be easy. So she didn't do it for fun, or to get her story in the paper. He must have done something to rattle this woman, and I admire her courage. And to the cop, get a guy to rub you down next time.
trespass
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 6:54 a.m.
The University of Michigan administration is considering a proposal to reduce the standard of evidence to convict a student under the code of conduct from "clear and convincing evidence" to a "preponderance of the evidence". The rationale is to make it easier for women to bring forth sexual misconduct charges. If applied to this case, the new standard would mean that the women would only have to be more credible than the man. Why would the UM administration want to make male students so vulmerable to a false accusation?
RhondaM
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 6:50 a.m.
He has one of the BEST lawyers working for him, should be interesting to see how this case ends!
Dave66
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 6:49 a.m.
He said, she said. Good luck figuring it out. And stop calling her a victim. It has yet to be proven that a crime has been committed. Right now she is an accuser and he is a defendant. Something about this story bothers me. She said she was "confused." Really? Confused? Never seen a naked guy before? Never noticed that OFTEN massage parlors are fronts for prostitution? She's massaging a naked guy's thigh and he gets aroused and she gets confused. As for "scared," one has to wonder what kind of heat the Deputy is packing. If he shouted, "Release the Kraken," instead of asking for [whatever], THEN I could see being confused and scared. :)
John
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 6:24 a.m.
Snapshot, I think this is the first therapist that has actually challenged him on this issue.
DeadHead
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 5:12 a.m.
Her word vs. his.. Going to be hard to convict him without more evidence.
KeepingItReal
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 5:04 a.m.
Something about this story doesn't quite add up.
del
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 3:52 a.m.
How long did it take for him to get booked into the hogback hilton?
FreedomLover
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 : 1:26 a.m.
Why is it necessary to be nude for a massage? Unless you are massaging parts of the body that normally would only be massaged for a reason other than a massage. I think the business that allows this needs to be investigated.
Anonymous Due to Bigotry
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 11:48 p.m.
Matt: I agree that it's quite sad that every time a male is accused of something like this by a female, everyone immediately jumps to the conclusion that it must be true. There are lots of sleazy guys out there for sure, but there are also some women out there with a certain type of personality disorder (possibly subthreshold) that involves making stuff like this up in order to get sympathy and satisfy some sort of emotional need. I think perhaps part of the problem is that while people are very familiar with the former, they aren't aware of the later than thus assume that no woman would ever have any reason to lie, but unfortunately for the innocent women out there there are still some who will. The women who do lie are outright traitors to the innocent ones because their lies create increasing levels of skepticism toward any woman's story in this kind of situation. So I'm personally not going to jump to any conclusions here either way. Generally something like this doesn't just come out of nowhere and a full investigation and trial will reveal certain patterns of behavior that would support one possibility or the other. A news story this short is certainly not going to reveal anything other than the fact that someone was accused and arrested.
Matt Cooper
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 11:29 p.m.
Man, if I am ever accused of anything, anywhere at any time, I DO NOT want any of you on my jury. Just because the guy is accused of a crime doesn't mean he's guilty. And good luck proving that he is, since apparantly the only two people involved were alone in a closed room with no other witnesses. Her word against his does not amount to a conviction.
bunnyabbot
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 11:17 p.m.
it's just an accusation at this point. as a female who only goes to a female massage therapist, the same one for 6 or 7 years now, I am always naked under the sheet, although, I am sure a boob of mine has been exposed at some point. But not only is this massage therapist in a vulnerable spot, but so is any male client who is nude, semi nude and in an enclosed room.
Commoncents
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 11:13 p.m.
The guy had been going there since 2008 and all of a sudden he decided to try to get a HJ? Yeah right. Any guy that's a regular at a place like that for multiple years is suspect to say the least.... plus you NEVER get caught the first time....
Anonymous Due to Bigotry
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 10:26 p.m.
It does seem a little odd that someone who had been a customer of the place since 2008 would suddenly do something like this.
snapshot
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 10:06 p.m.
Good for the therapist and her ability to communicate with her family to help her find the courage to stand up to an abusive authority figure. I can understand her reluctance. I'm even surprised he was actually arrested, let alone suspended WITHOUT pay. Why it is harder to convict authority figures than ordinary citizens is beyond me. It should be easier because they hold a public trust. They should also not be "treated like everybody else" they should be treated far more severely for the betryal of the public trust. Washtenaw County isn't that big and yet this is the third case of a public trust betrayal. The other two are the embezzlement cases. Wait a police officer went to jail for excessive force and another was aquitted. These folks must have Detroit mentors.
stonecutter1
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 9:56 p.m.
Wonder if the Washtenaw Sheriff and prosecutor will pursue this with the same vigor that they do with the "criminals" on Michigan Ave. in Ypsi? Surely they will convince Lenawee Co. to proceed with charges against this miscreant!
frozenhotchocolate
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 9:39 p.m.
Ok, he is nothing but human, just happens to be a cop. Ive never done anything like that, but lots of people do things like that. Officers of the law are employees, people, Jesus rating is most unatainable in anyone, so why is this news. Relax, he was prolly just lonely, made over a hundred grand a year cause of OT, needed something to spend his oversalery on. Tis to be expected.
M.
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 : 8:40 p.m.
Wow. This is a real gem! Perhaps he was confused about what is "criminal"?