Posted on Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 8:30 a.m.
Teacher accused of giving sexual material and alcohol to teen
By Cindy Heflin
A Van Buren Public Schools teacher accused of having a relationship with a 15-year-old boy faces arraignment today, WXYZ reported.
School district photo
Comments
Billy
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 6:48 p.m.
Well done on the censorship once again. You're clearly meeting the needs and desires of your readers if you have to ALSO delete their comments... Your policy seems to be working well Tony.....
Mac
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 6:17 p.m.
Too bad she wasnt my teacher back in the day.
Jimbo
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 7:38 p.m.
Where were these teachers when I was 15? All we had was a bunch of angry mastadons!
Mick52
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 5:51 p.m.
I wonder if the parents of the 15 year old keep track of him at 1:30 am. While some folks think they are well hidden in a car parked in an empty lot, it sure stands out when the patrol car comes by.
treetowncartel
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 4:42 p.m.
This should be interesting to follow for a while.
Paula Gardner
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 2:16 p.m.
Comments regarding the teacher's appearance have been removed. Also - some comments that treat this situation lightly may technically fall within our conversation guidelines. However, I do hope that readers can react to this as a news story that has real implications for all of the people involved.
a2citizen
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 3:48 p.m.
"...comments that treat this situation lightly..." er, uh, except for shalis' comment.
DonBee
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 12:59 p.m.
Here is a take on the broader issue. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443437504577547313612049308.html?KEYWORDS=teacher+union+protect
DonBee
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 2:41 p.m.
Cash - A similar article about the hearing was in the NY Times, but because it is behind the paywall, I did not link to it. Instead I picked this one, since it was free to view for anyone.
Cash
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 2:12 p.m.
Who would you expect Rupert Murdoch's rag to blame?
Bertha Venation
Tue, Jul 31, 2012 : 1:02 p.m.
Good article, Don. Thanks!