You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 5:58 a.m.

Augusta Township to ask voters to approve millage to reinstate police coverage

By Tom Perkins

Augusta Township officials are again asking residents to consider paying for police coverage.

Voters there rejected three proposals to renew the township’s previous contract with the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Department; most recently in November 2010.

election2012.jpg

Check out the MLive Voter Guide

That has left the township without police coverage for the past two years. The Sheriff’s Office and the Michigan State Police have both responded to emergency calls, though there are no deputies or troopers dedicated to the township.

“The level of police service went close to zero,” Augusta Township Trustee Bill Tobler said.

Residents will be asked to consider a 1.7 mill tax to be levied from 2012 to 2015. It would generate approximately $326,000 in the first year and provide for two full-time deputies dedicated to Augusta.

A police service unit, which includes a deputy and costs of command staff, detectives and other costs that also come with the deputy is $152,000. Tobler said the township is asking for slightly more than that as officials anticipate falling property tax revenues and possible increases in police costs over the life of the four-year millage.

Sheriff Jerry Clayton said there are several scenarios on how the department would deploy deputies in the township. He said the department has reviewed the township’s crime statistics and would first focus on when calls for service are the highest.

Sheriff's Department officials will discuss those scenarios with residents during an informational meeting at Lincoln High School, 7425 Willis Road, at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday.

sheriffscar.jpg

The millage would allow for two full-time deputies in the township.

Having two deputies dedicated to the township would help reduce response times to emergency calls, Clayton said. He said data show that the response times to calls for emergency service in York Township are much quicker, and York is a similar community to Augusta.

He added that two deputies would help the department proactively police and it would establish a police presence in the township.

“We would see a greatly enhanced response time, and if there’s a dedicated staff in the township responding to township-specific issues, then we are in a better position to be proactive,” Clayton said. “We also know that officers’ presence is a deterrent to crime. The fact that there would be deputies patrolling the township, we believe, would immediately have a positive impact."

The Sheriff’s Department saw a number of calls for malicious destruction of property, family troubles, suspicious circumstances and home invasions, which has been a problem throughout much of the county in recent years and in neighboring Ypsilanti Township.

Clayton stressed that the millage's approval is the first step and the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners also must approve the contract. Clayton said he has already discussed the issue with the county administrator and he is hopeful that if the millage is approved then there will be deputies patrolling the Augusta Township in the first quarter of 2013.

Augusta Township Trustee Mike King said he thought residents rejected the previous renewals because of the recession.

"They couldn’t afford it and people had to shore up their own finances and make sure they have enough money to put groceries on the table," he said.

But he said residents need to take a look at the bottom line and see that it might cost $5 a week to have police protection.

In 2010, the five-year, 1.8 mill tax levy was rejected by voters 57.4 percent to 42.7 percent. In total across all three township precincts, 1,341 residents voted no while 996 voted yes.

The issue was brought up to the board by Augusta Township resident Samantha Towler, and King said she has campaigned for it.

The entire township board has supported law enforcement millages in the past and does so again this time around.

"The voters are the ones who decide on the millages, as they cast their votes and decide what they want to pay for," King said.

Tom Perkins is a freelance reporter for AnnArbor.com.

Comments

chris crawley

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 5:33 p.m.

Police enforcement is a major issue. Maybe the reason it fails is that the board of trustees is so bitter and anit-resident. aanyone going to a meeting for the first time will be appalled at the rudeness, hostility and snideness toward each other and by some to tbe public. a little lady near near me said " that man )the current supervisor) is the nastiest person I have ever seen. Did he not have parents? " interesting observation. So the anti-police millage may just be a reaction to this current out-going board, 3 have been eliminated already, how many more need to go? We all need to think deeply about that..

Mike King

Mon, Nov 5, 2012 : 4:46 p.m.

Chris, I am having trouble understanding your comment. I agree we do have a board with bitter disagreements on many items; however, our board has always agreed we need to provide our township with extended police protection. I cannot make the connection to voter rejection of the police mileage to the township board, I also disagree that our township board it "anti-resident". In fact, I think that all of our board members would express great regard for our residents, we just disagree many times on what is best for them. Resident participation in township board meetings is critical and welcomed!

Laura Jones

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 1:27 p.m.

The rest of us are paying for their coverage. Hardly seems fair.

Mike King

Mon, Nov 5, 2012 : 4:39 p.m.

As mentioned in my previous post, our township has very limited proactive patrolling. Most of the police activity is in response to calls from residents specific to incidents they experience such as theft or vandalism. Passing of this mileage will allow for actual patrolling of our neighborhoods and streets.

Laura Jones

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 2:03 p.m.

Then why do we pay more for them to cover our areas?

nekm1

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 1:32 p.m.

The Sheriff and State Police are paid by everyone currently living in the County and the State....

nekm1

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 12:53 p.m.

Are the residents complaining about the current coverage?

Mike King

Mon, Nov 5, 2012 : 4:37 p.m.

Our township has very limited proactive patrolling. Most of the police activity is in response to calls from residents specific to incidents they experience such as theft or vandalism. Passing of this mileage will allow for actual patrolling of our neighborhoods and streets.

A2comments

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 10:44 a.m.

Renistate? Reinstate.... Does the software not spell check?

Julie Baker

Wed, Oct 24, 2012 : 3:25 p.m.

That typo has been corrected.