You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7 p.m.

Ann Arbor DDA approves $50,000 to hire consultant for Library Lot proposal process

By Ryan J. Stanton

Peter_Allen.jpg

Peter Allen, a local real estate developer, addresses the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority's governing board at today's meeting.

Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

Local real estate developer Peter Allen encouraged Ann Arbor leaders to consider a broad vision for the future of the entire area surrounding the so-called Library Lot as they decide what will be built on the downtown site.

Allen addressed the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority's governing board today before it approved providing $50,000 to the city to hire a consultant to help evaluate proposals for the lot, a 1.2-acre site on South Fifth Avenue.

"To me, the issues that you are going to discuss about hiring this consultant relate to a timeless, 100-year decision about what is it that makes a great, great city," Allen said, suggesting the site has the potential to be "the place for Ann Arbor that you always want to take your guests - you always want to go to and walk through, that you want to say is an emblem about what is really special about Ann Arbor."

City officials have been evaluating six proposals submitted in response to a request for proposals on the Library Lot. Allen said the conversations should include what could happen with the former YMCA site across the street, plans to redevelop the library headquarters next door and future plans of the Ann Arbor Transportation Authority, which has a bus station across the street and is planning to expand.

Only one board member today objected to the $50,000 allocation, citing concerns that the roles between the DDA and the city in the RFP process are beginning to muddy. He argued the DDA should stay out of the process.

"I have to say, I'm not enamored with the city's RFP process for public sites," said board member John Mouat, a local architect. "I don't think there's been a whole lot of success in them up until now. ... I think that the overall process needs to be thought through more clearly."

Mayor John Hieftje, also a member of the DDA board, said he shared some of the same reluctance as other board members who cited past failed RFP processes in Ann Arbor. And that's why he said he believes it's important to hire a consultant.

John_Mouat.jpg

DDA board member John Mouat, left, objected to giving the city money to hire a consultant for the Library Lot RFP process today.

Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

The city has been criticized for several recent RFP processes. The developer of the former YMCA lot filed a lawsuit against the city for backing out of an affordable housing project, no recommendation was ever made by the city's RFP committee for 415 W. Washington, and Village Green appears to have stalled due to the developer's financing troubles.

Hieftje said he's willing to accept the possibility that none of the six proposals for the Library Lot will reach fruition.

"If one of these projects isn't approved, I think that's a perfectly acceptable option," he said. "It's clear that this is an important site, so I have always said from the very beginning that if this process doesn't work out - we don't get from this what we hope to get - we'll try again sometime later."

DDA Chairman John Splitt said the city can spend the $50,000 as it sees fit, though the DDA is recommending tasks the consultant should complete.

"This money is going strictly toward whatever the city decides it's going toward, whatever they want the consultant to do," Splitt said. "I think that the city administrator ultimately will have to make the decision about who is hired. We are only offering the money, and we don't have any other say."

Recommended tasks for the Library Lot consultant, approved by the DDA board, include:

  • Determine if the projects submitted to the city are financially feasible and make economic sense in the Ann Arbor marketplace.
  • Determine if the developers who submitted proposals to the city are financially stable and have the capacity to construct and complete their projects as proposed.
  • Determine what the likely timing for each proposed project might be following selection by Ann Arbor City Council, including design development, securing financing, and construction.
  • Help the city determine which project will provide the maximum financial return to the city.
  • Help the city determine which project will provide the greatest community benefits.
  • Help the city determine which project will provide the greatest benefit to downtown.
  • Help the city create and deliver a public process that encourages community input and involvement.
  • Provide information on the impact of similarly scaled projects in similarly sized communities.
  • Assist the city as needed in negotiations with the selected project team.

John_Splitt.jpg

DDA Chairman John Splitt offered an update on the South Fifth Avenue underground parking structure project today, saying drilling should begin this month.

Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

Splitt offered an update at today's meeting on the infrastructure work being done to make way for the four-story underground parking structure being built at the Library Lot. One of the six development proposals will be selected to go on top of the parking structure.

Splitt said officials expected to start earth retention work by now, but that's been pushed back again.

"Essentially we're running behind on utility relocation," he said. "Because at one time we were thinking that we were going to start the project on the west side. We pulled it to the east, so it's sort of rearranged our utility relocations and so we are racing. And DTE, AT&T and the other utilities are working very hard and being very cooperative in getting that work done, but we still aren't quite there yet."

Splitt said drilling for the earth retention system should begin no later than Jan. 25.

DDA board member Joan Lowenstein said some projects that came forward from RFP processes in the past were well-intended.

"Where some of them have gone awry has been in the whole financial, putting-everything-together stage," she said. "And so this is to try to stave off that occurrence where you might have a very good project - even something that has a lot of public support - but doesn't have the ability to get from beginning to end."

In a separate vote, the DDA board agreed today to spend $600,000 for new water mains under Division Street, South Fifth Avenue and Library Lane. In August, the board approved $226,000 for three new water mains under Division Street, South Fifth Avenue, and behind the library from William Street. But upon bidding, actual costs exceeded initial estimates, and a new plan was developed to place the third water main under Library Lane rather than off William Street.

Ann Arbor resident Alan Haber, who submitted a community commons proposal for the Library Lot, also addressed the DDA board today.

"Green will bring the green," Haber said, urging officials to capitalize on the chance to create a large open space downtown. "The community needs a place like this and the Library Lot is the only possible place in the foreseeable future."

Ryan J. Stanton covers government for AnnArbor.com. Reach him at ryanstanton@annarbor.com or 734-623-2529.

Comments

SBean

Fri, Jan 8, 2010 : 1:52 a.m.

"One of the six development proposals will be selected to go on top of the parking structure." Not necessarily.

Awakened

Thu, Jan 7, 2010 : 10:20 a.m.

Wow! Just wow! Shouldn't all of this been done as part of the original project? Only now they are wondering what to put on it!

Andy Piper

Thu, Jan 7, 2010 : 9:10 a.m.

"the site has the potential to be "the place for Ann Arbor that you always want to take your guests - you always want to go to and walk through, that you want to say is an emblem about what is really special about Ann Arbor." Good evaluation criteria. Thank you. This is a special location and opportunity - don't blow it! Our city has a special sense of place that few cities in SE MI have. We can really add to it with the proper development of this site. BTW, underground parking is much better to look at than those ugly parking structures that fill up the skyline. Put parking underground.

Grumpy

Thu, Jan 7, 2010 : 7:34 a.m.

"the issues...relate to a timeless, 100-year decision about what is it that makes a great, great city." Good to hear there is someone that realizes this is not about short term gains. And this from a developer no less.

annarbor28

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 10:51 p.m.

Are these articles about DDA a joke? They seem so out-of-touch with reality.

annarbor28

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 10:37 p.m.

why are they building an underground parking structure? Serious question, I missed those politics.

Castanza

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 9:24 p.m.

For all those who are concerned on how to pay for the outdoor civic center on top of the underground parking structure, I have the answer. The DDA! They control all parking revenue & by all accounts are flush with money. Having the underground parking structure pay for the proposed downtown park makes the most cents.

djm12652

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 8:53 p.m.

I got an idea, why not turn part of the Williams and 4th Ave parking structure into a skateboard ramp? I've never seen it full, with the exception of Art Fair [daytime only] and soon we're gonna have EVEN MORE parking spaces to go unfilled. I do like BenWoodruff's idea but I gotta tell ya, I can pick one of the projects presented as most feasible for a lot less. But one thing, when is the City and the DDA gonna wake up and stop peeing away the money?

racerx

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 8:40 p.m.

@a2phiggy-I long thought that same reason, why not hire a consultant BEFORE even digging a hole for the parking structure. This seems rather backwards, but, coming from the leaders (and I use that term loosely) in the city their track record is very telling on former projects that never got off the ground (as cited in the article). However, Hieftje's quote that he's willing to accept the possibility that none of the six proposals will reach fruition? WTF? If nothing is ever built on top, then there'll be a 600 space parking lot under utilized while the city just magically awaits for something to come later. Yea, good luck with that Hieftje.

eCoaster

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 8:16 p.m.

Instead of having the consultant analyze the 4 (or 6?) current projects, which were generated through a questionable RFP screening process, why not recommend that he use his expertise to develop a winning proposal? That would seem like a good investment. Otherwise, given the recent history cited in the article and Hieftje's ambivalence about reaching a concrete outcome (pun intended), this all could go nowhere.

jasonburns

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 8:09 p.m.

The city of Ann Arbor does not research or consider their return on investment(ROI). That is why they fail. ROI is the most important part of business, and Ann Arbor is a business. Especially in this econonomy. It is a time for towns such as A2 to make money and prosper!

BenWoodruff

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7:28 p.m.

And here is the problem...$50,000 for a consultant to develop the space and the Mayor says, "If one of these projects isn't approved, I think that's a perfectly acceptable option." I have a better idea...take the $50,000, change in into quarters, flush them down the toilet, one by one,tape it for CTN and at least we get some entertainment value for our money!

Lokalisierung

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7:24 p.m.

""Green will bring the green," Haber said, urging officials to capitalize on the chance to create a large open space downtown." That would bring the green out of my pocket for more city parks & taxes eh? No thanks. Go down and hang out in the Diag if you want an open space.

Eric P

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7:22 p.m.

Let's hope that who ever they hire will be local or at the very least from southeast Michigan.

heresmine

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7:18 p.m.

One of the dumbest ways to spend money I've ever heard.

a2phiggy

Wed, Jan 6, 2010 : 7:17 p.m.

It's unfortunate that the value of an outside, independent consultant was not considered before the challenges associated with City Hall. The questions concerning relevance, feasibility, community input and precedence are important to consider in any size project. Perhaps this appointment could include reviewing approved, but not yet initated, public projects including the infamous million dollar fountain?