You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 7:29 a.m.

The Blackbird Theatre's not horsing around with intense, rewarding 'Equus'

By Jenn McKee

Thumbnail image for Equus.jpg

Which is worse: feeling pain, or feeling nothing?

That’s one of many questions driving Peter Shaffer’s “Equus,” now playing at the Blackbird Theatre. (Note for those lining up a babysitter: the production runs nearly three hours.)

The Tony-winning drama focuses on a psychiatrist, Martin Dysart (Lee Stille), who’s asked to treat a young man, Alan (Evan Mann), who violently blinded six horses. As trust slowly builds between doctor and patient, the bizarre mystery of Alan’s act is unraveled, and the existential ache at the center of Dysart’s life is exposed.

Per Shaffer’s script, all of the players stay on stage throughout the show, composing a sort of silent, watchful chorus when not involved in the action.

For “Equus,” set designer Barton Bund has shrouded the Sh\aut\ Gallery in black, while curved white piping, like scattered ribs, provide texture and underscore the play’s macabre tone.

And while the tight space occasionally challenges director Sarah Lucas - Alan’s crucial childhood flashback scene seems awkwardly staged, to name one example - she generally does an admirable job harnessing the myriad challenges of “Equus.”

It helps, naturally, that Lucas has a pretty strong cast with which to work. Yes, actors occasionally slipped in and out of their British accents on opening night; but this was a minor issue in a production that grew breathtakingly enthralling as the play progressed.

Of course, the audience’s guide through this dark tale is Dysart, and in that role, Stille anchors the production with powerful authority. Spanning moments of quiet reflection, rage-fueled questioning, and everything in between, Stille provides an arresting, sympathetic portrait of a man who’s thrown into personal crisis while questioning the good served by “curing” the passionate, if pained, Alan.

Mann, meanwhile, took some time to find his footing on opening night, but by the second act, his guts-out commitment to the role (including an extensive nude scene) won me over. Plus, the ensemble deserves accolades of its own, by virtue of its work in individual roles, but also thanks to its uncannily haunting depiction of a stable of stomping, sputtering, ominous horses.

Many elements contribute to these scenes, of course. Bund’s wire frame horse head masks, paired with Luna Alexander’s costumes (complete with trailing skirts of metallic items that sound like rattling chains when the actors move); Emily Clarkson’s atmospheric lighting design; Jennifer Graham’s thoughtful movement/choreography; and the ensemble’s eerily powerful execution all combine to make the stable scenes an intense, all-consuming feast for the senses.

Plus, John Dioro’s affecting, subtle sound design adds subtle chords of emotion to a number of scenes throughout the show.

There are some who believe that the moment for “Equus” has passed; and indeed, a few things in the script feel too “on the nose” (Alan replacing his bedroom poster of a bloodied Christ with a poster of a horse) and over the top (Dysart’s sublimely disturbing nightmare).

Yet nonetheless, my guess is that you’ll be hard-pressed to resist being drawn into Shaffer’s strange mystery all over again - such that wild horses couldn’t drag you away.

Jenn McKee is the entertainment digital journalist for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at jennmckee@annarbor.com or 734-623-2546, and follow her on Twitter @jennmckee.

Comments

Christopher Potter

Wed, Mar 2, 2011 : 10:49 p.m.

To Loveaduck: Bravo! You nailed precisely what's wrong with this spectacular but dumb play in that "it makes the worse argument appear the better." I believe Shaffer himself was aware of this flaw given his repetition of the words "The boy's in pain," the drama's bottom line morally and emotionally. Alas, the playwright couldn't resist once again parading his odd personal demon -- I want to be a superman! -- affixing the same mouthpiece to Dysart he used on Pizarro in "The Royal Hunt of the Sun" and Salieri in "Amadeus." For all its breathtaking theatrical qualities "Equus" remains rehashed Laingian twaddle, as you point out. Which doesn't, surprisingly, make for a noxious evening of theater. I'd urge playgoers unacquainted with Shaffer's Complaint to simply sit back and enjoy the show, the pleasures of which are legion. Just don't take the thing too seriously. As Loveduck suggests, doing so might not be good for you. Christopher Potter

Blackbird

Sun, Feb 27, 2011 : 5:15 p.m.

That's very interesting indeed. I think Shaffer is wise to keep his ideas in context of character, and shows the conflict within the brilliant and wise psychiatrist, rather than answering too many of the questions himself. In the end, it is a beautiful story about love, love between a doctor and a seemingly impossible patient. Director Sarah Lucas and actor Lee Stille handle the mix of ideas and conflict very tenderly. It is a very moving portrait of a relationship between two troubled souls. A play can be dangerous when it seeks to provide too many answers. Any political or philosophical agenda, any message, can easily become propaganda. That is never good. Francois Truffaut talks about "distance" in his films. Artistic distance, for the Blackbird, is the idea that we can do or say anything in a play or film, as long as we restrain our impulses to answer the questions that are, ultimately, beyond us. I hope you get a chance to see the show and how we handle the psychiatric science of it. It is a mystery story, an investigative account, and the ethics of it all are fascinating. Martin Dysart is like House on "House." He is a detective, a scientist, a brilliant and unorthodox practitioner, who has to break the rules to get his patients what they actually need.

Lovaduck

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 9:41 p.m.

I saw the play in the '70's with a then young Anthony Hopkins and was bowled over by the staging. But the "madness is beautiful" and that "psychotic individuals just have a 'different reality'" crap really doesn't age well (any more than did the theories of the "mad" psychiatrist, R.D. Laing on which much of this play, which could be actually psychologically damaging to people, is based. It IS a commanding piece of theater, but it is a good illustration of why Plato thought theater could be dangerous, in that it makes the worse argument appear the better, and prefers emotional rushes over truth. A person who blinded innocent animals isn't just different, says the idiotic playwright, his mythic world is BETTER than our banal reality. Ain't that grand? I'm sure the production is fine!

Blackbird

Sat, Feb 26, 2011 : 4:48 p.m.

That's very interesting indeed. I think Shaffer is wise to keep his ideas in context of character, and shows the conflict within the brilliant and wise psychiatrist, rather than answering too many of the questions himself. In the end, it is a beautiful story about love, love between a doctor and a seemingly impossible patient. Director Sarah Lucas and actor Lee Stille handle the mix of ideas and conflict very tenderly. It is a very moving portrait of a relationship between two troubled souls. A play can be dangerous when it seeks to provide too many answers. Any political or philosophical agenda, any message, can easily become propaganda. That is never good. Francois Truffaut talks about "distance" in his films. Artistic distance, for the Blackbird, is the idea that we can do or say anything in a play or film, as long as we restrain our impulses to answer the questions that are, ultimately, beyond us. I hope you get a chance to see the show and how we handle the psychiatric science of it. It is a mystery story, an investigative account, and the ethics of it all are fascinating. Martin Dysart is like House on "House." He is a detective, a scientist, a brilliant and unorthodox practitioner, who has to break the rules to get his patients what they actually need.

Blackbird

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 8:55 p.m.

Read Michael Margolin's rave review in encoremichigan.com: <a href="http://encoremichigan.com/article.html?article=4263" rel='nofollow'>http://encoremichigan.com/article.html?article=4263</a>

Jenn McKee

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 2:14 p.m.

An addition was made to the review to indicate that the production includes nudity, and thus is for mature audiences.

Blackbird

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 1:38 p.m.

Rogue Critic Carolyn Hayes calls the Blackbird's EQUUS &quot;Enthralling. An accomplishment of directing, acting, and design.&quot; Check out the Rogue Critic's stellar review here at <a href="http://roguecritic.blogspot.com/2011/02/equus.html" rel='nofollow'>http://roguecritic.blogspot.com/2011/02/equus.html</a>!

rusty shackelford

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 11:46 a.m.

As of early Friday morning, there seems to be some glitch preventing the review itself from loading, although the shell of the site and the ability to comment remains.

Bob Needham

Fri, Feb 25, 2011 : 12:38 p.m.

Yes, there seems to have been a server problem overnight. Sorry about that.