Is helicopter parenting going out of style?
That's how Barney's New York Creative Director Simon Doonan recently described the past decade in women's fashion.
"Shoes became ridiculously high and very painful to wear, and women's sense of their own bodies became very masochistic, like legs never long enough, boobs never big enough, faces never Botoxed enough," Doonan said.
But Doonan predicts that the pendulum is about to swing, with women relaxing these unachievable ideals and viewing themselves in a more bohemian way. (Darn it, and I just finally got some sky-high heels and a corset belt.)
I would argue that parenting trends in the past decade (or more) have mirrored fashion's extremism: babies never attached enough, kids never safe enough, parents never involved enough. We have masochistically pursued "perfect parenting," which roughly translates to dawn-to-dusk enrichment while eliminating every possible risk for our kids.
Even "bohemian" parenting message boards like those on Mothering.com are filled with questions about the safety of everything from toys to vaccines, from mothers who use their signature lines to compete for some uber-parent title: "Wife to my hippie husband and mama since 2/24/09 to DD, the constantly nursing toddler formerly known as sling baby, homebirthed, organic, and diaper-free." Chew on that one.
But the parenting pendulum has already begun to swing the other way.
The tipping point, I believe, occurred in 2008, when syndicated columnist Lenore Skenazy wrote a piece about letting her 9-year-old son navigate the New York City subway alone.
The column initially set off a firestorm of criticism, and she was dubbed “America’s worst mom.” But 20 months later, Skenazy now heads up a movement that is the antithesis to helicopter parenting.
At her Free Range Kids blog, Skenazy describes the philosophy this way: “[W]e believe in safe kids. We believe in helmets, car seats and safety belts. We do NOT believe that every time school age children go outside, they need a security detail.” The blog chronicles outrageous examples of overprotectiveness, such as the school district in Saratoga, New York, that forbids elementary students from biking to school. You know, for their own good.
A growing number of parents are tuning in to this movement, and the media is starting to take notice. In November, Time and CBS both ran pieces on "the end of overparenting." As the Time article puts it:
All great rebellions are born of private acts of civil disobedience that inspire rebel bands to plot together. And so there is now a new revolution under way, one aimed at rolling back the almost comical overprotectiveness and overinvestment of moms and dads. The insurgency goes by many names — slow parenting, simplicity parenting, free-range parenting — but the message is the same: Less is more; hovering is dangerous; failure is fruitful.
There are even those who've already taken it to the opposite extreme. The parenting website Babble.com has an ongoing series of "Bad Parent" columns, in which parents brag about flouting popular advice. "My daughter watches up to 6 hours of TV a day!" one column proudly proclaims.
As a mom, I have felt this transition. And as a parenting writer, I can see the evolution in my own work. When I started my blog on MLive.com six years ago, I named it Neurotic Mom. My first few posts were about chemicals leaching from baby bottles, SIDS, and studies showing babies can be deprived of oxygen in their car seats.
Now, I'm not saying those things aren't worthy of concern, but the tone was a bit, shall we say, hysterical. I still remember the agony I felt when I read about those car seat studies, thinking of how many times we had let our six-month-old daughter sleep in her car seat when she was a newborn, because she wouldn't sleep anywhere else. I spent days peering at her, analyzing her eyes, her sounds, her movement, trying to discern whether she'd suffered brain damage. (She's fine.)
Over the years, my outlook has tempered, and I wonder if the moniker Neurotic Mom still fits. Certainly there's a part of me that still worries about my kids and whether I'm doing this parenting thing right. That's pretty universal, isn't it? But the oppressive worry is gone. Perhaps that's a normal progression of motherhood, but I think it has been helped along by the relaxing parenting norms.
Whatever the reason, I take new causes for concern (Zhu Zhu Pets are toxic!) with a generous dose of salt. And I've found that being a parent these days is a lot more fun.
Of course, as I'm writing this, I glance up at CNN and see a segment about a Georgia couple facing charges of cruelty to children — for giving their own kids tattoos. While individual moms and dads may be trying to turn this overparenting ship around, it's going to take awhile for our society and institutions to catch up.
What do you think? Take the poll:
Jen Eyer is on the Community Team at AnnArbor.com. She oversees the Parenting and Home & Garden sections, and writes feature stories, blog posts and opinion pieces. She can be reached at 734-623-2577 or jeneyer@annarbor.com.
Comments
Sif
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 4:28 p.m.
It's all about perspective, isn't it... According to this article's author, I might be considered over protective because I won't put any unknown carcinagenic into my children, via vaccines. On the other hand, parents who vaccinate their children for every common childhood illness could also be considered well overprotective. I have certainly been called reckless for risking my children dying from a complication of chickenpox! Likewise, we co-sleep, which apparently is still a MASSIVE suffocation risk to babies (we've very fortunate, despite our reckless co-sleeping our child have managed to keep breathing)... And yet, even though we, according to this article, must be overprotective parents, we still allow our kids to walk to the corner shop without us, and other irresponsible parenting practices... Seems we're bad parents, whatever course of action we take...
citrus
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 1:48 p.m.
I know, it really must seem like we're all on crazy kool-aid! Before I had a kid I thought so too--had people left their brains in the birthing room? All I can say is, it is very daunting to realize that you are absolutely responsible for a little (initially) helpless person that you caused to be here. For some women, once they get into the mode of protecting the cub, it's hard to stop. I confess to being an overprotector in some areas that my daughter genuinely did need protecting aka coddling in. In others we are, well... It's hard not to let the protecting blob all over everthing, and to figure out what things she's grown into handling. But geez louise I certainly won't have any desire or energy to sit in a college interview! We get criticism on the flip side of this issue too. For instance, my girl used to get hysterical at the slightest injury, not walking when she had a skinned knee, and not wanting anybody to touch her. So, when she fell, I'd be standing there looking at her, saying, "You are overreacting. Remember, your skin and blood cells will grow back. You MUST walk now." etc without "kissing the ow-ie." The looks I'd get! Ice maiden, how can you be so cruel not to carry the injured chick back to the nest? When it comes to parenting, there's always somebody more than willing to remind you that you aren't doing it right, and to make you feel like dirt even if they don't have a clue of what your world is. That constant criticism in and of itself will suck the common sense out of a person.
Craig Lounsbury
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 11:15 a.m.
As the father of 3 daughters, all now in their mid to late 20's I can say that none of them came with an "owners manual".
Annie Zirkel
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 9:26 a.m.
Finding that 'Just Right' parenting is a challenge. Most parents either over or under shoot it. Of course there's crazy extremes on both ends. There's hovering and then there's smothering and there's benign neglect and then there's real neglect. But honestly - If I had to choose - caring too much seems like a better mistake to make. In my experience, it's easier to help parents get perspective so they can back off (which many do need to learn!) then to get them on board to pay more attention.
Sarah Nicoli
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 8:39 a.m.
I'm with you, Jen--leave the hovering behind. But, keep the belt--it's adorable!
spm
Mon, Jan 11, 2010 : 7:57 a.m.
I don't have children, so I've watched this phenomenon from afar via my relatives and friend's children, and have wondered what type of kool-aid they all drink after they have children. Suddenly the world (and neighborhood) we live in is worse than the highest crime rated cities in the world with murder and mayhem just around the corner. In a tony suburb of Ann Arbor? Really? Then there's my co-worker who still calls her college age children every day to wake them up to make sure they get to class on time, and my boss who sat in with his daughter at her Ivy league college interview. I would have died of mortification had my dad come with me to my college interview! Perhaps my parents were too hands-off, but these kids growing up seem a bit too coddled for their own good. There is need for some middle ground and I hope it's swinging that way soon.
Craig Lounsbury
Sun, Jan 10, 2010 : 4:55 p.m.
Back in the "good old days" (early 60's for me) it was nothing for me and my pals to get out of school at 3 and get home at 5 or later. We'd regularly get side tracked in Sleepy Hollow, a nice little patch of woods on the edge of EMU. But alas "they paved paradise and put up a parking lot". Well technically they put up a parking structure, but the net result is the same.
Ignatz
Sun, Jan 10, 2010 : 12:23 p.m.
Crimeny, I hope it's over. Evening working with U-M students who are supposed to be adults can put one in the path of the Helicopter Parent. Some of them act like Apaches! Let the kids trip and skin their knees so they can learn skills they'll need for later in life when the parents are not around.