You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 1:38 p.m.

Michigan Theater hires security guard to clear out 'graffiti alley' as East Liberty Street concerns grow

By Lizzy Alfs

The Michigan Theater, an anchor of downtown Ann Arbor’s East Liberty Street corridor, hired a security guard to patrol the next-door “graffiti alley” on Thursday.

Michigan-AnnArbor4x6.jpg

The Michigan Theater hired a security guard to patrol the nearby graffiti alley.

photo courtesy of the Michigan Theater

The move comes as East Liberty businesses and shoppers are reporting a rise in aggressive panhandling, crime and public drug use — which, several business owners said, are driving customers away.
graffiti_alley.jpg

Some local business owners have reported concerns about crime and public drug use occurring at the graffiti alley.

Ryan Stanton | AnnArbor.com

The alley — which is partly owned by the Michigan Theater and is located steps to the west of the entertainment venue — is an iconic part of Liberty Street. But the crowd that’s gathering there recently sparked concerns among local businesses.

Russ Collins, executive director of the nonprofit Michigan Theater, said the security guard told people in the alley on Thursday that they could not loiter there.

“We told folks that were here, including the Michael Jackson impersonator, that they weren’t going to be able to do this for a while,” he said.

It marks the second time in recent weeks that a private entity has hired a security company to guard East Liberty Street. In August, real estate firm McKinley Inc. hired security guards to monitor the Liberty Square parking garage after a woman was raped there — part of a string of sexual assaults in downtown Ann Arbor.

Collins declined to say whether the security guard is temporary or permanent.

“I don’t know,” he said. “Maybe it was just that one day.”

UPDATE 9:15 p.m. A Sentinel Security guard in a red jacket was patrolling the alley at 5:30 p.m. today. He said he had been asked to monitor the alley to deter suspicious activity and that his appointment was open ended for now.

Collins emphatically asserted that he does not believe there’s an issue with crime in the graffiti alley.

“Perception is more important than fact,” he said. “There’s a perception that it would be a positive move.”

The graffiti covered alley has several owners, including the Michigan Theater, the city of Ann Arbor and McKinley.

“I’m in that alley all the time, and there are young people there and most of them are just nice kids,” Collins said. “But young people do all kinds of things that are not approved by adults and maybe illegal.”

Recently, nearby business owners have raised concerns about panhandling and crime on East Liberty Street stretching from Division Street to State Street. Several owners cited the alleyway as a hub for loiterers and possible criminal activity.

But others describe the alleyway as an important part of urban culture and a unique draw to Ann Arbor.

Collins pointed out that many high school students have their senior pictures taken in the alleyway and student films are made there.

Last week, Ann Arbor Police Chief Barnett Jones said his officers regularly patrol the alley. He wasn’t sure whether there has been a rise in criminal activity there.

Nearby business owners told AnnArbor.com that Collins recently visited their stores in an effort to raise money to pay for the security guard.

“He came here, but I wasn’t here,” said Andrea Graef, owner of East Liberty Street candy shop This & That, which plans to close in November. “He says there isn’t an issue, but who is he trying to kid?”

Abraham Hejazi, owner of Allure boutique on Liberty, said he’s more concerned about the panhandlers outside his store.

Hejazi noticed that when the security guard asked people to leave the graffiti alley yesterday, they moved across the street to stand outside the former Borders store. The 42,000-square-foot store closed Sept. 12.

Hejazi said the alley doesn’t need a security guard, but the city needs a stronger police presence downtown to deter crime.

Since McKinley’s decision to hire security guards, guards have been posted at the East Liberty and Washington Street entrances to the Liberty Square parking garage.

Employees of McKinley Towne Centre tenants, Google, Ann Arbor SPARK, law firm Bodman and the Bar Louie restaurant are among the drivers who park at the garage. The garage is also open to customers who visit the Michigan Theater after 3 p.m. on weekdays and all day on weekends.

“We just want to make sure people feel comfortable and help them through what we’re dealing with right now,” Tom Gritter, McKinley's vice president and managing director of commercial real estate, told AnnArbor.com in August.

Lizzy Alfs is a business reporter for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at 734-623-2584 or email her at lizzyalfs@annarbor.com. Follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/lizzyalfs.

Comments

snapshot

Wed, Oct 5, 2011 : 12:59 a.m.

Get city council to put a city income tax on the ballet and we can have all the police we need instead of the needing all the police for 36,000 students and U of M employees who pay no property taxes for their "protection".

Sadie Buttons

Tue, Oct 4, 2011 : 5:36 p.m.

If anyone is concerned about Michael Jackson, he is out there right now so all is well.

jeff bush

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 1:47 p.m.

Folks, In the first place @Burger, and the candy store are start up companys , When you start up you need to have enough money to make it for a couple of years .poor planning .... not the fault of beggers

pbehjatnia

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 12:35 p.m.

I spent last week in Florida. Do you know what I noticed? That there were no broken streets and bridges and that I was not panhandled. That there were no panhandlers in any of the shopping or entertainment areas. No, I was not in Disney Land or tourist hell. I was in a normal small city. Yep. Clean. Safe. What Ann Arbor could be if we had a decent mayor and city council. Our leaders were good when the economy was doing well. They are not able to cope adequately with a bad long term economy and the challenges that come with it. We need strong leadership that puts safety first. No safety= no business= even less jobs being created -- of any kind. We do not need new art now or in the foreseeable future nor do we need our limited police resources being used to patrol crosswalks. Please put viable candidates - dem or rep - on the next ballot that can handle our present challenges and bring us into the future safely.

A2Susie

Sun, Oct 2, 2011 : 2:58 a.m.

I'm not sure who you think is responsible for putting "viable candidates ...on the next ballot." Citizens like you run for these positions. They decide they wish to run, collect signatures, and if they have enough legitimate signatures submitted by the due date, they will be on the ballot. You can do this. It's not always up to everybody else.

MrRoboto

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 11:18 a.m.

I can't believe they told the Michael Jackson impersonator to beat it. Now that I know the area is so bad I will make sure to avoid it completely. I can always watch old movies for free at home instead of paying full price to watch them at the Michigan Theater.

SonnyDog09

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 11:12 a.m.

Why don't they just put a gate or fence across the opening to the alley? Wouldn't that be a cheaper way to keep the riff-raff out?

Alan Goldsmith

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 11:05 a.m.

Certainly glad my membership contribution to the Michigan Theater is going to a worthy cause. (Sarcasm). The funny thing is Russ 'DDA' Collins and his little group of officials appointed by The Mayor have babbled on for the last two years cutting downtown police patrols was no big deal. Even HE doesn't think it's an issue but yet he's hiring a guard to harass people because of the media witch hunt designed it seems to generate webpage hits. Maybe Mr. Collins can call the Governor, someone he made a political contribution to, so the Nerd can send in a Security/Financial Manage to disband the police and resolve the issue for us.

A2Susie

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 3:11 a.m.

Well, I haven't been here ALL my life; I arrived in 1967. We had our share of panhandlers then too, and I have not noticed much difference in their numbers or aggressiveness over the years. The big difference I see in Ann Arbor is that we are experiencing very hard economic times now, and most of us have cut way back on our spending. For me, this means not going where I am tempted to spend. I imagine the same is true for U of M students whose families have less discretionary spending too. To blame the closing of two high-end shops on the activities of the poorest among us is foolish at best. It is quite common to find a scapegoat to blame hard times on - Jews in Europe, immigrants here and elsewhere, anyone who is different in some identifiable way from our own scared little selves. To blame the homeless - the poorest of the poor - for our economic woes downtown? Please! We are all victims, folks, and those on whose shoulders should rest the blame are not poor.

a2baggagehandler

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 3:02 a.m.

This is much more interesting reading: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_mongering" rel='nofollow'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_mongering</a>

Robbo

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 12:11 a.m.

Tesla, your comments are right on the money.

A2Resident

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 12:06 a.m.

The panhandlers are becoming an issue. I was approached on a Sunday afternoon as I was walking my kids up to the Michigan Theater and a scruffy male panhandler approached my 8 year old child and asked if they had any change to spare, That right there is enough for me to say...IT'S OUT OF HAND and the police need to step in. Also, there are so many homeless people in Ann Arbor because they are busing them in from Jackson as we have one of the best homeless shelters and organizations that help the homeless in southeast michigan. I feel if the city is going to do this then they need the manpower to regulate the homeless activity. I'm all for helping the homeless but don't bus a bunch of them in and the layoff half the police force. It's just a given that the majority of them have mental illnesses and or drug/alcohol dependencies.

ChunkyPastaSauce

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 12:03 a.m.

"Russ Collins, executive director of the nonprofit Michigan Theater.. "We told folks that were here, including the Michael Jackson impersonator, that they weren't going to be able to do this for a while," he said. &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;But he emphatically asserted that he does not believe there's an issue with crime in the graffiti alley. "Perception is more important than fact," he said. ""&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; So the issue is hyped/overblown and the michigan theater is only taking action because it's overblown.. not because a problem exists. lol

Tom Joad

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:10 p.m.

Lock the place down, issue criminal trespass warnings and enforce them.

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 10:57 p.m.

While we're at it, can be clean the alleys between Liberty and Washington? Those alley ways smell of garbage, grease and other trash that are constantly there. Oh, excuse me, expensive restaurants resides on those blocks. Wouldn't want to blame citizens for not supporting a thriving business due to unsanitary, smelly, eyesore conditions.

Brian Kuehn

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 1:36 a.m.

@racerrx: Yes-really. I thought the specific discussion was about human behavior in and around the area of Liberty and the Michigan Theater and more generally perceived aggressive panhandling.

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:13 p.m.

@Brian Kuehn-really? Sarcastically speaking, my point is that this is an non issue, and if those that be are concerned about what occurs in alley's, chalk up the ones that are smelly, greasy, and full of trash. Plus, alleys are a great way to get across certain blocks in the city instead of sidewalks. Especially on bike and foot.

Brian Kuehn

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:07 p.m.

I was not aware that the article or subsequent discussion involved the odor of specifc alleys. Perhaps you should start a separate discussion about your concern for the smell of alleys you frequent?

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 10:49 p.m.

Big surprise! As I said before, once some people begin to perceive this as an issue, a gate would be erected and another quirky aspect of Ann Arbor would be gone. To those business owners who are partially blaming their demise on these individuals maybe they should understand their market better. Those businesses that survive in this area offer a need and a service that are primarily students. What student wants expensive chocolate? What student is dressing to be a diva? In the current climate that surrounds this area of town, Shaky Jake probably would not have been welcomed.

jns131

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:50 p.m.

What I have noticed is that after the bridges to Detroit from 94 were rebuilt, they stayed clean. I saw graffiti one day and the next? Gone. Nothing left. Detroit is really keeping a handle on that stuff. As for pan handlers? I had an aggressive one near Detroit the other day. Came right up to the car as I was parking it. Scared the daylights out of me. Then he followed me. I had to threaten him with police force. He left but still. This is what it can come down to in Ann Arbor if we are not aggressive with these beggars.

Goofus

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:24 p.m.

The central problem is and has been the City's continual cuts to the police department. Add more foot patrols, beat cops, and those bike cops that went around downtown ...and problem solved. Also, get rid of all the congestive construction downtown, which just creates dark nooks, depressed unpedestrian-friendly blocks which cut off foot traffic (I'm looking at you, AADL parking lot crater!), and which has funnelled the poor, panhandlers, and criminals into the square block areas of the State/Washington and Main/Liberty.

Homeland Conspiracy

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:56 p.m.

We need to get rid of potholes &amp; air

Mark

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:18 p.m.

The biggest reason the panhandlers &quot;flock&quot; here is that they can make money from students, period. You don't need to acknowledge a panhandler, just ignore him and move on. Don't give him (so far I have seen no females panhandlers) any lip, any money, or reason to hang around. If there was no money, they would not be here. There is an ordinance about how close they can be to ATMs (which I think is about 20 feet). I called AAPD one day when one panhandler was standing right next to an ATM on N. State, gave a good description and offered to send a photo. They apparently responded fairly quickly. As far as people &quot;busking&quot; for a dollar -- I have no problem with that. At least they are trying to entertain and they aren't in your face asking for money. They make things less sterile. But the real bums will move on if you don't support them. Foot patrols are the only way to reduce their presence. It worked in the past, and whether it's bicycle-mounted cops or foot patrols, it obvious that their presence helps out a great deal.

Homeland Conspiracy

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:01 p.m.

Let's paint it all white &amp; bland. Unless white is to threatening or aggressive. What has happened to this once great city. There use to be colors &amp; all kinds of flavors in this town. But not any more just bland &amp; safe. Things have gotten so bad that &quot;they&quot; would run Shakey Jake out of town. I'll take a fun roller coaster ride over a bland &amp; safe merry go round ride any day.

Goofus

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:25 p.m.

most of the panhandlers I see are white males. There are very few panhandlers of color in this area of downtown.

bedrog

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:56 p.m.

Whatever does or does not go on in the alley crimewise , the graffiti itself is evidence of a crime against private property and that it is there in such massive amounts, in a not-so- out -of- the way- place , suggests a deficiency in law enforcement, and a community's hyper tolerance of simple vandalism. And , yes, virginia, i know all about &quot;public artists&quot; from keith haring, and ' Banksy'...all the way back to the stone-age cave art at lascaux and chauvet ( which itself, according to varied archeological theories, may have been the result of anything from profound religious expression to paleolithic gang &quot;tagging&quot;.) But again in the local case : private property/vandalism. period. (at least a public art commission...their taste and fiscal judgement aside...represents a semblance of elected officialdom deciding what goes up, as opposed to arrogant and usually supremely untalented ( and often spelling impaired) vandals deciding for themselves .. and on on others' property at that.

bedrog

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:05 p.m.

Oh yeah...and i'd add a reference to the &quot;broken windows&quot; theory of sociologists wilson and kelling that documents the cascading downward effect neglected and defaced property can have on a wider neighborhood.

a2citizen

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:39 p.m.

I wonder how many visitors the beggars, bums and panhandlers attract.

nixon41

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:38 p.m.

On second thought you could use that for FREE ART for the city. Just erect a sign so people can find it.

nixon41

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:36 p.m.

About time

scenedujour

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:30 p.m.

I am not trying to suggest there isn't a problem but I personally haven't noticed any changes, or an increase in panhandling activity, and I am in the area frequently. I am a student at the University and I do make it as far as Thompson and Liberty at least twice a week. There are never more than 1 or 2 panhandlers out in front of Borders, but there is usually a fair amount of people in the alleyway. I haven't seen them bother anyone though. The other day I went to the post office and I was very much on the lookout for panhandling activity having read here that it was an increased problem but I honestly didn't see more than 3 panhandlers unless the folks hanging out in Liberty Square were taking a break from their panhandling. So to cap off, I wonder how many businesses are simply overreacting to a slowdown, which probably has a lot more to do with the economy. It seems to me like the panhandlers make an obvious target. And I am not a panhandler apologist. I never give them money, but I can't condone people just blaming them for the ills of society because they are convenient.

Blanch DuBois

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:17 p.m.

What if we could come up with a visual aid that would benefit all. Perhaps we could have red and green buttons or ribbons to wear. Wearing red signifies that you do not hand out money on the street. (It doesn't mean you don't give to organizations that help the less fortunate; you just don't hand out money on the street.) Green signifies that you do give money at the street level. That way those who are &quot;working&quot; the street won't be wasting their time (or yours) and can focus their energies on more lucrative prospects. Sounds like win/win all around.

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:16 p.m.

I think most of the posters here are overstating &quot;agressive panhandling&quot;. They consider any panhandling to be agressive, and would just assume have the police break the law by violating the rights of these panhandlers and arresting them. I got news for you people...The rights of these people to have free speech outweighs your right to not be annoyed. If you can't stand the thought of someone talking to you in public, then stay in your own home.

Brian Kuehn

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 10:55 p.m.

How do you define aggressive panhandling? Are there any sort of limits you would place on panhandlers? We both support 1st amendment rights but certainly some controls need to be in place for this type of activity, don't you think?

puncturedtime

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:15 p.m.

Ross and Bear hit the nail perfectly on the head. These panhandling articles, based on a couple small remarks from understandably upset retail owners going out of business, have inflated a problem that exists in every city. It is the simplest form of fear mongering. There's always been a constant debate about whether ESPN is, first and foremost, a news source or a news creator. They often speculate about athletes, teams, and sports' conflicts and project potential scenarios. These articles do exactly the same thing. Collins said there wasn't a problem outside the Michigan Theatre, then 2 more articles were published on the same issue. Then aa.com threw journalists at propagating the myth of the dangerous and aggressive panhandlers simply because a lot of people commented on the first article. Collins took note of the community's interest in this non-issue, and appointed a security guard as a publicity measure to &quot;protect&quot; us from a problem he doesn't even believe exists. This article, along with all the others on the subject, should be labeled as opinions and treated as such. And in my OPINION, these articles have sensationalized and created a larger perception issue than the very problem it attempts to examine. Ann Arbor is not Bloomfield Hills or Oakland County. People need to drop their sense of entitlement and perception that they are too professional or deserve much better than be &quot;attacked&quot; by these &quot;human eyesores.&quot; This is an urban city. That said, I don't like beggars. I don't like giving money to people who might just blow it on drugs. No one does. However, I'm realistic and know they will always exist to an extent, and the most I can do is ignore them instead of lamenting a fallacy of urban decay that these journalists have dreamed up and labeled as &quot;news.&quot;

Top Cat

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:11 p.m.

Now here is a great idea...let's wait until more people stop coming to the area, more businesses close and there are more vacant store fronts. Then let's go a few more rounds on this discussion.

David Wizard

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 2:28 a.m.

Yeah, because SO MANY businesses have closed because of panhandlers and artists on the street... Please name a single business that fits this description.

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:22 p.m.

So is the problem the homeless? Or are the rents too high? My guess would be that if businesses started failing left and right, the wealthy property owners would be forced to lower rent to a reasonable level...But we cant put any blame on the wealthy property owners, now can we? Instead, lets put the blame on a population of people that have been in the area for 40+ years.

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:11 p.m.

Sad to hear about the intolerance thats takiong over A2. Next we will be asking the street preformers, artist, and musicians to leave the city. The most depressing part of the story, is that they asked the Michael Jackson impersonator to leave. That guy is an A2 icon. Just goes to show what the DDA thinks of Ann Arbors culture. They would rather A2 become a homoginized version of West Bloomfield.

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:02 p.m.

True. Now will that person who wears a wolf's mask and plays the violin be asked to leave each corner that he/she perches on? Mmm......

Macabre Sunset

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:31 p.m.

It sounds like you understand, then, why people avoid visiting downtown because Ann Arbor does not discourage aggressive panhandling. What confuses me is why you criticize them for exercising their right to choose where to shop. And you don't criticize the panhandlers for exercising their right to aggressively harass shoppers. Seems to me both choices would be equal, given there is no social contract in your world.

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:02 p.m.

Macabre, social contract implies an agreement between parties. And forcing someone to comply with a &quot;social contract&quot; would in reality violate the definition of contract. And you certainly do have every right to not participate in legal activities that others don't approve of... But please dont expect others to do the same. Also, I'm sure that there are people of all socio economic backgrounds that might be annoyed by panhandling... But I'm sure the DDA could care less if people who are not spending money are annoyed.

Macabre Sunset

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:54 p.m.

There are a lot of legal activities I don't engage in because I care about other people. Why are your panhandling friends exempt from a social contract to behave with common courtesy toward others? It's OK to be different. It's great to have true variety. But being a burden to society is not a noble pursuit. Why do you assume that all the people who don't want to be accosted in public by your friends are wealthy? Where does that bigotry come from?

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:30 p.m.

Macabre, asking for spare change is protected under free speech. And mandating that people be polite to each other is an egregious violation of free speech that borders on criminal insanity. I just think that A2 is an excentric city full of all different types of people, and that there is a group of property owners that want to turn our city into a high rent yuppy land, were people are locked in jail for exercising free speech, so that the wealthy might be able to walk around freely and support $200/sq ft businesses.

Macabre Sunset

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:22 p.m.

Why is it considered intolerance to ask the city to prohibit aggressive behavior? What is wrong with demanding that people, even the sainted poor, behave with kindness toward strangers? We all have to contribute to making a society. Those who are willing to cause others harm in order to get ahead should be told to stop. And, yes, I'm talking about both these panhandlers and some businessmen.

Wolf's Bane

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:07 p.m.

First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

bedrog

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 9:01 p.m.

HUH?? in the present context ,and by the implied logic , maybe the next line of pastor neimuller's parable should be: Then they came for the graffiti vandals and pushy panhandlers...etc Sounds a bit silly ,doesn't it ,in the context at hand??

mr_annarbor

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:44 p.m.

I can honestly say that I've never been aggressively panhandled, I attend films at the Michigan Theater and the State Theater at least once a week, and am downtown at least three times per week. I think this business of aggressive panhandling is much ado about nothing.

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:01 p.m.

I've never been panhandle either. Though I've been pothandle.

scenedujour

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:39 p.m.

Mike. This article and all the previous articles on this site have stressed that the problem is between State St and Division. So which is it? Main and Liberty which would have little bearing on these businesses or is it actually between State and Division? In either case there might be some rush to blame or simply a desire to get rid of panhandlers entirely.

Atticus F.

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:15 p.m.

I think most of the posters here are overstating &quot;agressive panhandling&quot;. They consider any panhandling to be agressive, and would just assume have the police break the law by violating the rights of these panhandlers and arresting them. I got news for you people...The rights of these people to have free speech outweighs your right to not be annoyed. If you can't stand the thought of someone talking to you in public, then stay in your own home.

James

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8 p.m.

Well what I think most fail to realize... Is the simple act of asking for change to some is viewed as &quot;aggressive&quot;... You know, the people who were coddled as children... The ones who never hear the word no... The ones who have never have to worry where they're going to sleep tonight... Where they're going to get a meal etc...

Mike Martin

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:53 p.m.

Head on over to Main and Liberty. Cross the street a couple directions. It happens all day. I'm not sure how you can spend time downtown and not be aggressively panhandled.

Mike

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:50 p.m.

Good for you; I hope the panhandlers are reading this and leave me alone and start working on you for money.

Bob Heinold

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:41 p.m.

Still another step to a pre-Giuliani NYC

Roy Munson

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:28 p.m.

I am downtown every day in these places. I get panhandlers every single day after me. And yes, some of them can be quite aggressive. I've been followed, yelled at, etc. I'm a pretty big guy, so they aggressive ones don't scare me. If I was a woman out walking alone though, it would probably really scare me. In that case, I certainly wouldn't come down here to do things that weren't necessary like shopping in the stores and eating out. One aggressive bum came up to me last week and got right in my face with a story about how he was a former boxer who is now homeless. He wanted me to give him some money so he could go into the coney island because he was very hungry. I told him I would go in there with him to get a job application and he swore at me and chased down the next person.

Stupid Hick

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 5:35 p.m.

&quot;I told him I would go in there with him to get a job application&quot; Well, think about it a moment. You could have responded with a simple &quot;no thanks&quot;, or ignored him and kept walking. When you invite conflict don't be surprised if you get a vigorous response.

Alan Goldsmith

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:28 p.m.

&quot;Contrary to some of the nearby businesses, Russ Collins, executive director of The Michigan Theater on East Liberty Street, said he doesn't see any negative effect on the business from nearby panhandlers. "Do I think we live in a paradise that's like a theme park? I don't," he said. "Do I think the downtown is a dangerous and intimidating place? I do not. That makes it real." He said that of the thousands of patrons he sees and interacts with on a weekly basis, no one has complained to him about a panhandling issue. "We've got panhandlers, but there are lot worse things in the world," he said. "We have a vital, urban core, and it gets celebrated everyday by the thousands of people who come down here and feel safe and secure."&quot;

Ross

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:20 p.m.

Yeah this is getting annoying. There seems to be no difference in the downtown to me. There's always some vagabond types looking rough around the edges. That's normal. All of this &quot;drug use&quot; basically just means people smoking joints in the back side alley. What is the BIG FREAKIN deal....? We need to stop over-sensationalizing this issue. In my opinion it is basically a non-issue. The economy sucks, and the biggest draw to this area of downtown (Borders) just closed. There's plenty of reasons to blame for these silly little boutiques closing other than a few ruffians. C'mon, people. I fear we have a new round of &quot;white-flight&quot; on our hands from people who can't stand an occasional dose of reality in their pampered little lives. Every person who comments on articles like these to the effect of &quot;I don't even go downtown anymore because of this&quot; is the real problem, not the few panhandlers shuffling around town. If every stuck up rich person is going to start avoiding shops downtown, then the businesses will suffer, and that sucks. But maybe we could develop a better bohemian vibe in this city that otherwise stays pretty out of touch with how every one else in the world is living. End rant.

Goober

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 12:04 p.m.

Bohemian vibe - huh??

say it plain

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 10:15 p.m.

I agree with @Macabre lol, that wholesale dismissal of people's feelings doesn't do any good. I don't tend to get put off by panhandlers, but then I'm from a truly big city and this is small-time to me (maybe I also have the right city-savvy-carriage to avoid getting bugged after I say no, which I almost always do...not always always, but mostly always). I do get put off by the increasing *lack* of a 'bohemian vibe' in downtown Ann Arbor!

Macabre Sunset

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:16 p.m.

Your rant is as full of stereotypes and ignorance as what you accuse others of doing.

Macabre Sunset

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:01 p.m.

I haven't experienced aggressive panhandling, either. At least not in this city. But it's likely the aggressive ones only go on the attack when they sense they can physically intimidate someone. Why is it wrong to expect people to behave well - even if they have less than we do? Are the poor somehow exempt from any kind of contribution to society? This is hurting downtown business, whether it's a perception alone or a real danger.

Stupid Hick

Sat, Oct 1, 2011 : 5:21 p.m.

&quot;Are the poor somehow exempt from any kind of contribution to society?&quot; Hear, hear! The least they could do is stay out of sight or be more passive when begging.

Bear

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 6:50 p.m.

Tesla, your comment is uninformed and quick to blame. James, your statement is closer to the truth. I work in the area and walk through the 'painted alley' as it's called, all the time, at night &amp; during the day, even during the wee hours. I haven't seen this &quot;rise in crime&quot; or the &quot;open use of drugs&quot;. This article makes it seem as though there is a heroin shooting gallery going on there. I assure you, there isn't Ignorance can breed contempt. And this article borders on that. Business owners have their prejudices and are quick to blame any &quot;undesireables&quot; for any perceived drop in business. This is about as ludicrous as it gets, though. As far as the serial rapist is concerned, I don't see any security guards posted at Community High School, which is near where the first attempted rape occurred. Or any other location where rape occurred or panahandlers beg. Quit inventing problems, there are enough real issues to deal with, without fear-mongering. I've seen the panhandlers there; they've never bothered me and they've never been aggressive. I've seen them with signs begging, but never seen them harangueing people or demanding money. I think this is a lot of hype to create a boogeyman out of thin air. Also, McKinley hiring security guards to patrol the entrances to elevators in the structure is about as close to hiring guards to patrol the alley as if Dawn Treader Book Store had hired security to patrol IT'S doors and calling it patrolling the alley. In either case, it's not the truth. Associating the painted alley with a rape that occurred in the structure elevator is disingenuous at best. Can we cry wolf a little louder, please?

Goober

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 6:33 p.m.

Can they help us clear out the mayor and all of city council? This group is ruining our city.

Tesla

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 6:22 p.m.

Obviously it's time to clean house, and no offense to our indigenous under employed, lazy, crazy or in a drug hazy community, but it's time to throw the bums out! Comon A2 PD!

Tesla

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 11:18 p.m.

Hey all I know is if the business owners and residents of that area think there is a problem, who am I to tell them they are wrong. Just because you live in Ann Arbor doesn't give you any magical insight in to whether a business is being affected at any time during the course of a 14 hour business day. Are any of you down there all day? Do you keep business records and sit there all day wondering why your revenues are down while some dude hangs out in front of your store hassling potential customers? I think if any of you hippies had businesses and especially businesses down there you'd sing a different tune. The hippies can go someplace else. This is a business district occupied by tax paying hard working folks with a lot invested. Go smoke your weed some place else.

racerx

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 10:54 p.m.

@buildergirl-right on baby! Those who've been here in A2 for over 30yrs don't see this as an issue. These same people have been coming to and in A2 for as long also. Seemingly, it appears to be those who might be new to the community who were/are expecting a different climate. I guess this is the reason why there'll never be another concert on the river at Gallup Park!

buildergirl

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 8:06 p.m.

Please. If you are indigenous, you insult yourself in that statement. If you are not, you made a choice to move here feel free to make the choice to leave. As a life long resident I will say that the &quot;problem&quot; is no worse then in the past 30 odd years and no different then anywhere else downtown. And please don't act like the odd student smoking in the diag isn't a common occurrence. This isn't Mayberry.

Shope

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 7:40 p.m.

we got ourselves a rhymer

James

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 6:03 p.m.

This is the second article I have read on this subject... In both articles it sounds like the police are unaware of any problems... They state they patrol the area and it is just like any other. It leads me to wonder if the police are unaware of the problem? I find it hard to believe since these panhandler haters are so boistrous and can't wait to tell you why all of their problems are because of people standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands... Or could it be this alley doesn't have any more crime than any other alley downtown? In a couple months we can get over this panhandling thing and blame snow and snow removal for decreased buisness...

craigjjs

Fri, Sep 30, 2011 : 6:58 p.m.

The police have admitted that patrols of this area have been reduced. It is not a question of homeless people &quot;standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands.&quot; Reports are about people drinking, using drugs and urinating in this alley. There are reports of panhandlers following people, harassing them, blocking their way, following them into stores, and being very aggressive. It is not harassment of the homeless to require them not to engage in this behavior, it is protecting the rights of everyone.