You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 5:54 a.m.

After 'systematic breakdowns' and $35 million FDA fine, Terumo Cardiovascular Systems promises fixes

By Nathan Bomey

When a tubular device made by Ann Arbor area medical device manufacturer Terumo Cardiovascular Systems was removed from a patient during heart surgery at an unknown hospital, the device looked unusual.

Upon inspection, doctors realized that the diffuser tip of the device, called a cannula, had become entangled with a blood clot.

Sometime afterward, the patient died.

But Terumo CVS, which employs more than 430 workers in Scio Township, failed to properly investigate the incident, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigators.

Terumo_Cardiovascular_Systems.JPG

Terumo Cardiovascular Systems tests its medical devices in a simulated operating room.

Nathan Bomey | AnnArbor.com

The FDA investigators would later conclude that the cannula incident was one of many different problems that exposed Terumo’s failure to implement “an adequate and effective quality system at all levels of your organization,” according to documents recently provided to AnnArbor.com.

Terumo and the FDA last month reached a consent decree requiring the company to pay $35 million in fines, subject itself to regular inspections from an independent auditor and agree to limit sales of several of its products until the company adopts corrective action.

The FDA did not force Terumo to recall any of its devices, which suggests that it does not necessarily believe the company’s products are dangerous. And, in fact, in the incident with the cannula, the FDA accused Terumo of failing to properly investigate and report the incident - not of selling a faulty product.

But the FDA said that investigators observing the company’s Scio Township complex from January 2010 to March 2010 found "numerous" violations, including "deficiencies in processes for corrective and preventive action, nonconforming product, complaints, purchasing, process validation, design controls and adverse event reporting."

The consent decree gives Terumo up to two years to fix its problems to avoid further penalties.

It also comes as the FDA is enduring its own share of criticism for aggressively cracking down on medical devices and squashing innovation.

In an interview, Mark Sutter, CEO of Terumo CVS, said the company is already taking steps to improve its manufacturing processes and reporting procedures to meet the FDA’s demands.

“I’m not going to paint it as unfair,” he said. “We fully take responsibility for our requirement to meet FDA regulations. They’ve cited that we fell short, so we fell short. We’re taking that very seriously and expect to be able to address every one of them.”

For example, one of Terumo’s mistakes was that it would tell the FDA about a customer’s complaints in a single report instead of relaying each complaint as a separate item.

“We understand and agree that that was wrong,” Sutter said.

Sutter also acknowledged that Terumo CVS failed to report certain complaints “because we didn’t deem it as high enough risk for there to be a need to do that.”

Mark_Sutter_Terumo_Cardiovascular_Systems_CEO.jpg

Terumo Cardiovascular Systems CEO Mark Sutter

Photo courtesy of Terumo Cardiovascular Systems

In the incident with the cannula, the company said it investigated the situation and coordinated with the patient’s hospital and doctors, who conducted their own investigation.

“They determined and confirmed that the cannula did not have an impact on the patient’s death. That was our assessment (too),” he said. “There’s evidence on multiple angles to show that. The problem was our documentation on that was not sufficient.”

To be sure, Terumo CVS products are involved in more than 1,000 procedures a day throughout the world. And it’s not terribly uncommon for patients to die during heart surgery.

But the FDA was not completely satisfied with Terumo’s explanation.

“Your firm did not document the attempts to retrieve the product from the hospital, or document the reason why no products were returned for investigation,” the Detroit-based FDA investigators concluded in their original inspection report. “The investigation conducted by your firm did not include any attempts to try and recreate the problem on the remaining inventory in stock. Only a visual inspection of the remaining stock was conducted.”

The investigators added: “The investigation did not determine if your firm’s product caused or contributed to the patient’s death.”

Anastacia Bilek, acting director of the enforcement division of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, told AnnArbor.com that the incident illustrated the “types of breakdowns that this company has having.”

“You manufacture devices in the real world, so problems can occur,” Bilek said. “You have to have robust systems in place to detect those problems and when those systems break down, you put patients at risk. Terumo makes life-sustaining devices, and we here at the agency would expect all manufacturers to hold themselves to the highest standards.”

Kelly Murphy, a Kalamazoo-based life sciences attorney with Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn, said that, based on the FDA’s actions, it appears that the FDA does not believe that Terumo was responsible for the patient’s death.

But the FDA was not satisfied with the “quality system they had in place,” said Murphy, whose firm does not represent Terumo.

Terumo CVS products impacted by FDA investigation

The consent decree between the FDA and Terumo Cardiovascular Systems restricts the manufacturing and sale of the following devices to existing customers only, until the company fixes "numerous" problems at its Scio Township manufacturing facility.

  • Terumo Advanced Perfusion System 1
  • Sarns Modular Perfusion System 8000
  • Sarns Centrifugal System
  • HX2 Temperature Management System
  • Sarns TCMII Cooling and Heating System
  • CDI 500 Blood Parameter Monitoring System
  • Sarns Sternal Saw II System and Replacement Blades
  • T-Link Data Management Systems (software upgrades)
  • Cannulae for cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Cannulae for cardioplegia delivery
  • Vents, suckers, dilators, connectors and reducers.
“Once a medical device company gets approval to market and sell a life support system, something that has serious applications, there’s an obligation to report adverse events that may or may not be associated with a particular product,” Murphy said.

Years of problems

The FDA’s decision to pursue corrective action at Terumo comes after years of investigations that uncovered a variety of problems.

After inspections in May 2004 and December 2005, the FDA sent warning letters to Terumo, urging the company to “take prompt action” to improve its organizational structure and reporting procedures, among other things.

Sutter said Terumo had made improvements to its systems after those inspections, but they turned out to be insufficient for the FDA.

“We’ve always made it a top priority for us to take matters of the FDA very seriously and as those things were identified, those things were corrected,” Sutter said. “To be honest with you, we worked off of a false sense of acceptance from those past inspections, that they were good.”

But, after the 2010 inspections, it became clear that there were “systematic breakdowns in the company’s good manufacturing practices, or their quality system, as we call it,” the FDA’s Bilek said.

“This is a facility that’s had issues for some time. We ultimately felt here in the agency that the only way we were going to bring them into compliance was to get them under consent decree,” Bilek said. “There weren’t adequate corrections to prior observations and we saw similar problems showing up with each subsequent correction.”

According to the 42-page consent decree, which was certified by a U.S. District Court judge last month, Terumo is allowed two years to make the appropriate changes to its processes. After that, the company could faces tens of thousands of dollars in violations for every day that it fails to comply.

In the meantime, the company agreed that it will not manufacture or sell two heart-lung bypass systems and several other medical devices to new customers until it makes improvements. The firm can continue to sell the products to existing customers, but those clients must sign a special agreement acknowledging the circumstances.

The company must also open its doors to a third-party auditor who will deliver regular inspection reports to Terumo and the FDA. If Terumo fails to improve its processes, as determined by the auditor, the company could be subjected to additional penalties.

For now, customers using Terumo products — that is, hospitals, health care systems and patients — can continue using them because the FDA is concerned that pulling them off the market would cause disruptions.

A “healthy company”

Sutter said the restrictions would have “only minimal impact” on its revenue.

The company, a division of Japan-based $3.88 billion giant Terumo Corp., shares its sprawling 55-acre Scio Township campus with its Terumo Heart, a separate division that’s not affected by the FDA decree. Terumo Cardiovascular Systems has 435 employees locally, up from 367 a year ago.

The firm had previously been held up by the Michigan Economic Development Corp., Ann Arbor SPARK and industry leaders as an example of the Ann Arbor region's medical device prowess. The two Scio Township divisions in late 2009 completed a $3.6 million expansion that included 60 new jobs over an 18-month stretch.

Sutter said Terumo still plans to add jobs to its local operation to support the growth of its products.

Stephen Rapundalo, executive director of Ann Arbor-based life sciences industry association MichBio, said Terumo continues to be a “very healthy company.”

“It’s certainly not uncommon for companies to run into these compliance issues with the FDA. Clearly Terumo has some matters they have to deal with and improve internal processes to ensure proper compliance,” Rapundalo said.

“I don’t think there was any serious concern over safety. It’s just a matter of dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s, and the FDA is pretty harsh on things like that.”

FDA scrutiny intensifies

The action against Terumo comes amidst heightened FDA scrutiny of medical device and drug companies in recent years.

FDA supporters say the agency is protecting the public from harmful effects of industry products. Critics say the company is causing unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles for companies that are producing products that improve global health.

MichBio has been participating in a campaign with other biosciences industry groups to fight proposed FDA regulations that would involve more scrutiny for new medical device products.

“That would impinge on innovation without really proving that it’s going to add anything, bring along any added safety,” Rapundalo said. “The FDA is trying to load up even more restrictions.”

Rapundalo also criticized a “lack of clarity and transparency in the rules” for inspections.

“We’ve got reviewers who are interpreting the same rules in different ways, sometimes even within the same company at different times,” Rapundalo said. “The FDA has some internal control issues that they need to address.”

Bilek did not address a question about the political motivations behind the FDA’s crackdown except to say that, in Terumo’s situation, the company’s “whole system” for correcting and preventing mistakes was broken.

For instance, she said, the company continued to contract with a circuit board parts supplier even though that supplier’s parts were faulty.

“They had problems with how components were placed inside that circuit board,” Bilek said. “If your computer reboots, it’s probably not that big of a deal. If it affects your heart-lung machine during a heart-bypass surgery, that’s a little more troubling.”

Sutter said Terumo is making the appropriate changes to fix the problems with its products, including a device that was recording inaccurate measurements of patients’ potassium levels.

He said the company’s recent hiring has included engineers and “expertise to augment our quality system efforts.”

Contact AnnArbor.com's Nathan Bomey at (734) 623-2587 or nathanbomey@annarbor.com. You can also follow him on Twitter or subscribe to AnnArbor.com's newsletters.

Comments

WhyCan'tWeBeFriends

Mon, Apr 11, 2011 : 4:24 p.m.

Per the article: "the company's recent hiring has included engineers and "expertise to augment our quality system efforts." " That's a positive move, but as @Medical Device Professional notes, if the same management is in place, these new hires may just have their hands tied behind their backs in trying to implement change while operations continue in the same vein as always. An exercise in futility for the new hires.

Medical Device Professional

Mon, Apr 11, 2011 : 1:36 p.m.

I understand the company has recently acquired numerous experienced people from other medical device and pharmaceutical companies to add to the management staff. I'm curious what is happening with the management team who lead the company down this road the past 6+ years. I've heard that changes won't be coming, which I find very unsettling. What's the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Why keep the same management team in place and expect anything different?

WhyCan'tWeBeFriends

Mon, Apr 11, 2011 : 4:06 p.m.

Agreed. It seems a good spring cleaning is in order for the management team. Fresh perspectives should be welcomed, not, "but this is how we've always done it!" Clearly that isn't working.

Terminal

Mon, Apr 11, 2011 : 2:04 a.m.

Councilman Stephen Rapundalo's comments on FDA regulation are perfectly aligned with the values of Business and the Republican Party. Yet he claims Democratic affiliation. Let us all keep a watchful eye for regulation cutting in the name of balancing budgets. Let us keep a watchful eye on how often job creation and trickle down economic policy is used as an excuse for cutting public health and safety regulation and oversight. Let us keep a watchful eye and ear out for phony arguments, distortion and propaganda by business interests whose sole purpose is to care more for their bottom line than the health and safety of their customers or employees. As well, keep up with Mr Rapundalo to see where he fits in Snyder's Grand Scheme.

say it plain

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 9:23 p.m.

Why is it the FDA's policy in this case to refuse to state that they are 'sure' that the devices are safe for intended use? Is it perhaps because they *cannot* do so if the company isn't following the GMPs as required? If that's not it, I'd love to know why. And I'd love to better understand Mr. Rapundalo's and others' position about how somehow GMP requirements squelch innovation. I'm very glad that as @fishermon explains it to us, the FDA now has the capacity to force companies not in compliance with laws requiring that they do their due diligence in product quality assurance to take notice, via the only thing that will get their attention in some cases...in this case apparently!...hefty fines! I wish that entities like Mr. Rapundalo's consortium of biotech firms did not muddy the waters here by pretending that somehow such watchdog activities are 'anti-business'. They are only anti-profit-at-all-costs, and I find it rather shameful that they would stoop to defending a company that would not comply with repeated requests for quality-control improvements. To call it a simple matter of "dotting i's" is a slap in the face of those businesses which *do* take quality-control seriously, as we should hope all medical device companies would!

fishermon

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 8:54 p.m.

Fat Bill has good points. However, documentation is key here. Good Manufacturing Practices(GMP) is part of the Medical Device Law. This law, in part, requires a Medical Device to be manufactured in compliance with GMP or it is adulterated regardless if it meets the safety and effectiveness standard of the law. In former times the FDA could not fine a company for such a violation. They could charge the CEO and other responsible people with a felony but that was only done in the most egregious cases. This hampered the FDA's compliance efforts so Congress gave them the authority to levy fines at their discretion. In this case the fine probably will well serve Medicine, the general public, the FDA and, yes, Terumo. Because FDA did not shut down the Terumo operation or require recalls one may be certain that the Agency has determined that Terumo's Devices are safe and effective for their intended use but will not state that officially. I would not hesitate to have one of their devices used on me if I needed it.( I have no connection to the company nor do I know anyone now working there. I did know Dick Sarns, the initial ownner and very much respected him.) This incident will be very costly for Terumo well beyond the cost of the fine. But I predict that they will take this whole affair to heart(no pun intended) and continue to contribute to the well being of a significant number of people around the world.

say it plain

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 8:35 p.m.

Didn't really take notice before of the info at the end of the piece, d'oh! So, they clearly have been maintaining relationships with parts suppliers that *MAKE DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS*! And our esteemed City Councilman Mr. Rapundalo would argue that this is a problem with dotting i's?! Wow, hmm, perhaps the communications that he had with city attorneys that count for AA.com's FOIA requests as 'confidential' are of that same variety, of the "cover your nasty-business behind" variety! It's scary what some people feel they should be able to get away with; I'm glad that the FDA is at least attempting to hold their feet to the fire, and lets hope that Mr. Rapundulo and his MichBio folks limit their taxpayer-provided incentives to businesses that don't put out defective products!

say it plain

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 10:22 p.m.

Does AA.com get the irony here?! I know it's an aside, but still... Rapundalo speaks of "lack of clarity and transparency" in the FDA internal process!? And AA.com's FOIA about how he changed his mind regarding the conference center situation was rejected because he doesn't think 'clarity and transparency' should apply to his deliberations lol... The devil is in the details, so he said about why he changed his mind, but we don't get to share in those details because that would be, what, too embarrassing, too revealing of some dirt, what?! The devil is apparently also in the details of compliance with FDA requirements according to his industry lobbying efforts, but hmm, he doesn't think *those* details are worth attending to for medical device manufacturers, amazing!

say it plain

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 5:37 p.m.

Doesn't anyone, in their defense of businesses, find it troublesome that one of the problems the FDA has cited with Terumo has been "non-conforming product"? And relatedly, "deficiencies in process for corrective and preventive action"? Those seem to me to be issues beyond failing to file the proper paperwork for the bureaucracy! Those two strike me as critical, and as indicating that the FDA is not so certain, ultimately, that there aren't important deficiencies that might lead to problems with the machines they manufacture. Perhaps someone else makes these machines in a less error-prone way. I'd want this company to *get the message* that they cannot be allowed to put people's lives at risk with defective machinery, and the notion that somehow the government is squelching their ability to innovate is totally bogus, imho, in this domain. Clearly the FDA had had *enough* with this company, and decided it was time to force the hands of the management team, who'd apparently done all they could to ignore what the FDA had clearly indicated they needed to change.

Fat Bill

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 4:56 p.m.

One of the unwritten rules of any bureaucracy is that you must always justify your existence. Many mountains have been made from molehills for precisely this reason. What is gained by hitting the company with a $35 millon fine? I have no problem with the agency recouping expenses from a sustained complaint; the threat of shutting down a non-compliant company should be enough. That $35 million would go a long way toward implementing a vast new quality-improvement program, or r&d on new life-saving or life-sustaining products. No wonder modern medicine is so bloody expensive...

fishermon

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 12:57 p.m.

In my initial comment I failed to mention that I have been long retired from my Quality Assurance position. I was with Difco Laboratories years before it was purchased by BD Laboratories.

fishermon

Sun, Apr 10, 2011 : 12:51 p.m.

I have no doubt that Terumo folks believe they do not deserve the huge fine FDA has put on them. They more than likely believed that they had all the organization in place that the agency required.. However, it is clear from the past inspection reports that the FDA had been giving Terumo Executives specific signals that the Agency was unhappy with the Quality Assurance practices at the Terumo facility. It is very important that the Ann Arbor readers of the news article understand that Terumo's products more than likely are perfectly fine and are safe and effective for their intended use, the key requirement under the FDA regulations. This strangely enough is not good enough for the FDA. A company must have all the documentation in place to show with a high degree of confidence that the products are indeed safe and effective for their intended use. It isin this latter area where Terumo Executives had failed the test apparently. As the Executive in charge of the Quality Assurance for a Medical Device Company, I have had lots of experience dealing with the FDA here in the Detroit District. Much of my initial experience with them was not happy. I was involved very early with the promulgation of the Medical Device Regulations with the FDA and others in our industry to make the regulations conform to the intent of the US Congress back in the early seventies. Our efforts were to make these regulations meaningful for the safety and effectiveness of Medical Devices without harming the flexibility required by this very varied industry in Research and Manufacturing Procedures. There was lots of back and forth negotiating with the Agency and Industry over Good Manufacturing Regulations in particular. Documentation is key to the FDA Regulations and must be obeyed with a Religious fervor. Unless the Executives at Terumo take that to heart they will continue to have problems with the FDA.